article thumbnail

In a SAD Scheme Case, Court Rejects Injunction Over “Emoji” Trademark

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I’m sure you’re surprised to learn that when the judge actually reviewed the matter on a fully informed basis, it didn’t see trademark infringement. The court should have embraced its first instinct that the merchant didn’t use “emoji” as a mark. ” Trademark law does not restrict that usage.

Trademark 122
article thumbnail

The First Amendment Limits Trademark Rights, But How?–Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademark law area, and was one of the signatories of the First Amendment Professors amicus brief filed in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. by guest blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.

Blogging 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A National Right of Publicity: the Federal Anti-Impersonation Right (FAIR)

Patently-O

Unlike patent and copyright, trademarks and trade secrets continue to be concurrent and overlapping, meaning that state rights continue to exist and be enforceable alongside the federal right. With trademark law, the federal right has been around since 1870 and today occupies most of the space.

Privacy 98
article thumbnail

Trademarks as a Barrier to Free-Speech: An Examination of the MetaBirkins Dispute

SpicyIP

This article seeks to examine how trademark law interacts with the freedom of expression of artists to choose the subject matters they wish to engage with, using the dispute between Hermès, a fashion industry giant and Mason Rothschild, a digital artist, as a contextual backdrop. C) Any non-commercial use of a mark.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

If the Word “Emoji” is a Protectable Trademark, What Happens Next?–Emoji GmbH v. Schedule A Defendants

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The trademark registrations discourage that outcome. Otherwise, “emoji” is at most descriptive of the goods in question, so there should be an air-tight descriptive fair use defense. The court says: Fair use, however, is an affirmative defense, and none of the defaulting Defendants have appeared to assert it.

Trademark 112
article thumbnail

Trademark and Copyright Cases to Watch in 2023

The IP Law Blog

In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Andy Warhol Foundation made fair use of a photo of the late artist Prince. In short, the matter at issue will address when a work is sufficiently transformative to qualify for fair use protection under the Copyright Act. We’ll start with Andy Warhol Foundation v.

article thumbnail

Poking Fun or Making a Buck?

LexBlog IP

Supreme Court in June issued a decision involving trademark law. Jack Daniel’s brought trademark infringement claims against VIP Products, a company that produces a “Bad Spaniels” line of dog toys. VIP Products just won’t be able to rely on nominative fair use to protect against those infringement claims.