Navigating the Intersection of AI and Intellectual Property Law
JD Supra Law
MARCH 5, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a game changer across various sectors, and intellectual property (IP) law is no exception. By: Planet Depos, LLC
This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.
JD Supra Law
MARCH 5, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a game changer across various sectors, and intellectual property (IP) law is no exception. By: Planet Depos, LLC
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 1, 2021
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). SecurityPoint brought its claim for patent infringement against the United States under 28 U.S.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JD Supra Law
APRIL 5, 2024
A district court recently precluded a patent attorney from testifying as an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit where the proposed expert lacked the requisite technical expertise to assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence. By: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
SpicyIP
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
Adding another leaf to the FCM patent litigation saga, the Delhi High Court on September 19 refused to grant an interim injunction to Vifor considering the launch of the Biological E’s product in the market. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. Dharmendra Vora case, the 2015 Vifor (International) Ltd.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. 9,745,123 (“the ’123 patent”). 287(a) , Unverferth has affixed serial numbers to its products to identify the patents used in those products. . § Continue reading
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
OCTOBER 2, 2023
million jury verdict that had previously been awarded to Teva in a patent infringement suit regarding the two companies’ development of drugs with antibodies capable of treating headache disorders associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (“CGRP”).
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
NOVEMBER 13, 2023
involves an allegation of patent infringement over United States Patent No. Court documents state the patent at issue is for a “Vessel Rinsing Apparatus,” that was issued on August 15, 2023. Delta further cites Wenzhou’s use of Amazon to sell the accused products and encourage others to infringe the patent, as well.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
DECEMBER 8, 2023
They are alleging patent infringement concerning U.S. The complaint states that the Plaintiff (OP) has designed and patented an innovative orthopedic plate system explicitly made for pediatric patients. . (“WishBone”). 8,777,998 , titled “Pediatric Long Bone Support or Fixation Plate.”
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 11, 2021
With all these various fast food restaurants entering the fray, why did Chick-fil-A or other early players in the chicken sandwich game not block these upstarts with copyright or patent infringement injunctions? A 2015 court case and trade secret law help shed some light on this question.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 21, 2023
DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. According to the Complaint, DSI’s software includes numerous technological improvements that were captured in a family of patent applications. In 2022 the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No.
JD Supra Law
JUNE 1, 2022
Patent Infringement Case- The pharmaceutical company Moderna finds itself in an intense a legal battle regarding its popular Covid vaccine. Plaintiffs Arbutus Biopharma and Genevant Sciences are attempting to hold Moderna accountable for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
LexBlog IP
MARCH 5, 2023
Nu Tsai Capital, LLC, [2023-1146] (February 17, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Lite-Netics patent-related speech, holding that the district court abused its discretion. Lite-Netics owns multiple patents on magnetic holiday string lights. Patent Nos.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 9, 2022
PUMA also alleges that the Brooks shoe the “Aurora BL” infringes upon their Design Patent No. D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. The case was assigned to Judge Richard L.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No. 10,864,933 (“933 Patent”) entitled “Four Position Hand Truck” to Harper on December 15, 2020. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.
JD Supra Law
SEPTEMBER 23, 2021
The Utility of Patents and Infringement- Patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry is a very valuable tool used, not only to protect the property rights of a potential new drug, but also, to protect a potential revenue stream large enough to allow recovery of costs associated with the development of a drug.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. Following the abrogation of Form 18, patent infringement claims must satisfy the plausibility standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
NOVEMBER 24, 2023
According to the complaint, Davaus seeks legal affirmation that their product, the Kernel Keeper™ , does not infringe, is not covered by, and renders invalid the United States Patent No. ” S7 alleged that the Kernel Keeper™ infringed on their patent and demanded Davaus cease its production and sale.
JD Supra Law
DECEMBER 2, 2021
TSA’s Infringement: Even with processes as seemingly obvious as loading, conveying, and stacking security trays, entities such as The Transportation Security Administration are subject to U.S. Court of Federal Claims for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JANUARY 15, 2024
In the modern era of technological advancements and the burgeoning landscape of online commerce, the interconnection of patent law with the dynamics of e-commerce platforms presents intricate challenges. 11,473,277 (“the ‘277 Patent”) against specific Xin Glass Rinsers listed by Sanitary Ware on Amazon.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JUNE 25, 2021
Patent Nos. 7,860,448 and 7,412,203 (the “Patents in Suit”). The Patents in Suit relate to methods and computer programs for localizing broadcast content and an apparatus for operating a broadcast network, respectively. Westwood is seeking damages, including treble damages, for willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 8, 2023
for patent infringement. TeleBrands holds several patents related to the design and construction of expandable garden hoses, including US10174870 and US10890278 both titled “Expandable and Contractible Garden Hose.” Vieneci is accused of patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § Vieneci Garden, Inc.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 30, 2021
9,261,365 (the “‘365 Patent”). The ‘365 Patent is titled “Device, System and Method for Remotely Entering, Storing and Sharing Addresses for a Positional Information Device.” Because Social claims the Product infringes on at least Claim 1 of the ‘365 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 14, 2023
Batesville”), for patent infringement. Batesville is accused of patent infringement against Patent No.’s Plaintiff is requesting a judgment that the Defendants willfully infringed upon Plaintiff’s patents, injunctive relief, damages together with interest and costs under Lanham Act 35 U.S.C. §
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 28, 2021
9,054,860 (the “‘860 Patent”) for a Digital Verified Identification System and Method. According to the Complaint, Formstack, LLC (“Formstack”), the Defendant, offers at least one Product, Formstack Sign, that infringes one or more claims of the ‘860 Patent. The case was assigned to Judge Richard L.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 9, 2021
Vaxxinova is the owner of three patents at issue, all entitled “Immunizing Compositions and Methods of Use,” U.S. Patent Nos. 8,282,941 , 7,943,150 , and 7,943,151 (collectively the “Patents in Suit”). Elanco”), during potential business negotiations.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 25, 2021
Johnson claims it owns multiple utility and design patents including those at issue in this case, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,022,332 , 10,684,029 , 10,528,013 , 8,826,165 , 8,190,728 , D788,785 , D924,888 , D924,890 (collectively, “Asserted Patents”). The case was assigned to Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
OCTOBER 20, 2023
for alleged patent infringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. According to the complaint, Rogue Fitness owns several design and utility patents for fitness equipment, including Patent No. RE49,513 : “Barbell.”
IPilogue
AUGUST 24, 2022
Michelle Mao is an incoming 2L JD student at Osgoode Hall Law school and an IPilogue Writer. Litigation is almost always recommended to be avoided , whether because of the sheer amount of time needed to get a court date, the expensive costs for the client and law firm, or the risks associated with receiving an unfavorable judgement.
IP Watchdog
NOVEMBER 30, 2022
A group of 25 experts in intellectual property law sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Jonathan Kanter today in support of a business review letter that the group said, “represented a legally sound and evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to innovative commercial institutions.”
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 10, 2022
The Cost of Protecting Intellectual Property- A typical scenario for a patent infringement lawsuit may begin with some potential defendant selling a product. Next thing: you must defend against a patent infringement suit. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 21, 2023
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. Design Patent No. Background Columbia asserted U.S.
IPilogue
SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
Bonnie Hassanzadeh is an IP Intensive student and 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. I was tasked with creating business and marketing materials for the Engineering and Technology practice group, focusing mainly on topics pertaining to patent prosecution. As Principal Investigator, Prof.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
The significance of this case is that the Federal Circuit confirmed that parties can contractually negotiate away their right to file IPRs or other validity challenges in the Patent Office. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp.,
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 2, 2021
New Albany, Indiana – Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed a patent infringement suit filed by Plaintiff, Eddie M. infringed on his U.S. Green”) in March 2020 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Green, who claimed Defendants, Ara Yavruyan and Chain Vault Inc.,
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 13, 2021
Cross, the Plaintiff is the owner of three design patents for convertible t-shirt designs, U.S. Patent Nos. D/580,633, D/581,136 , and D/341,471 (collectively, the “Patents in Suit”). due to settlement and a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision regarding the ‘471 Patent. Walmart Inc. Kohl’s Inc. , 35 U.S.C. §
Kashishipr
FEBRUARY 9, 2022
To be specific, market research performed before filing a Patent Application or after obtaining Patent Protection may help an inventor or innovator significantly in examining the business environment for his invention or innovation. Market research may also help down the road in preventing Patent Infringement actions.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
The significance of this case is that the Federal Circuit confirmed that parties can contractually negotiate away their right to file IPRs or other validity challenges in the Patent Office. Despite this language, Sarepta filed seven petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp.,
Intepat
MAY 18, 2023
INTRODUCTION Oftentimes, it is observed how intellectual property laws, specifically; patent laws are contradictory to competition and antitrust laws. Patent laws acknowledge that patents play a crucial role in facilitating the exchange of goods and services.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2022
You launch your advertising campaign hoping for an increase in business – but the next thing you know, you are being sued for patent infringement in federal court. Bassfield IP LLC and the ‘053 patent. 6,641,053 (‘053 patent), entitled “Foreground/background document processing with dataglyphs.”
IPilogue
DECEMBER 3, 2021
Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 Intellectual Property Law & Technology Intensive Program. This prohibition originated from an old provision of the Patent Act (Section 41) interpreted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Tennessee Eastman. David Park is a 3L J.D.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
JUNE 13, 2023
HCM”) sued Philip Morris for patent infringement accusing Philip’s “electronic nicotine delivery system” called the IQOS system. HCM’s patent claims an electronic smoking device, that includes a limitation that recites a “combustible material reservoir” that “initiat[es] a combustion reaction in the combustible material reservoir.”
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2023
The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decisions because the PTAB erred in its obviousness analysis and found that Axonics failed to show a motivation to combine as to Medtronic’s ‘314 and ‘756 patents. Background Medtronic sued Axonics for patent infringement. Patent Nos.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 1, 2024
9,361,658 , owned by Mantissa Corporation , the court addressed the issue of claim definiteness in the context of an infringement dispute with First Financial Corporation and First Financial Bank, N.A. The case focused on interpreting terms like “ transaction partner ” and “OFF” within the patent claims.
Kashishipr
MAY 5, 2021
The term ‘Patent Troll’ originated in 1994 in an educational video by Paula Natasha Chavez called the ‘Patents Video.’ ’ A patent troll is a term used for describing a company that uses Patent Infringement claims to win arguments and court judgments for profit or to stifle competition.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content