article thumbnail

Historic $130m+ Patent Infringement Award Against the United States of America

Intellectual Property Law Blog

A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). SecurityPoint brought its claim for patent infringement against the United States under 28 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

AI Developing Software Companies Litigate Over Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. 284 , pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorney fees and a compulsory ongoing license fee. Patent infringement cases can be complex, and the outcome can have significant implications for both the patent owner and the accused party.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Vandor Group Inc. Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Batesville Casket Company

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Batesville”), for patent infringement. Batesville is accused of patent infringement against Patent No.’s Richmond, Indiana –The Plaintiff, Vandor Group, Inc. Vandor”) doing business as Starmark Cremation Products , filed suit against Defendant, Batesville Casket Company, Inc.

article thumbnail

Patent Experts Urge Kanter to Reject Calls to Scrap Avanci Business Review Letter

IP Watchdog

A group of 25 experts in intellectual property law sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Jonathan Kanter today in support of a business review letter that the group said, “represented a legally sound and evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to innovative commercial institutions.”

article thumbnail

Litigation as a Source of Profit? Non-Practicing Entities and Patent Litigation

IPilogue

The first kind, academic institutions, acquire patents to protect the research work of their faculty and researchers while licensing others to use the results of the research produced without commodifying the patent. They do not practice, develop, manufacture, or otherwise commercialize the patent.

article thumbnail

Rights to Asphalt Paving Technology at Dispute in Lawsuit Between AarMaz Products Inc, and Rieth-Riley Construction Co.

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

of Goshen, Indiana , alleging patent infringement related to their asphalt paving technologies covered by U.S. Patents Nos. These patents are associated with ArrMaz’s BondTekk® bonded-paving technology, adopted by multiple states and contractors for creating safer and more durable roads. 7,802,941 and 8,465,843.

article thumbnail

Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., Chilisin America Ltd. Nos. 2022-1873, (Fed. Cir. October 16, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Chilisin”) for patent infringement, alleging that Chilisin willfully manufactured and sold infringing chokes. Similarly, in the second case, Niazi Licensing Corporation v. Cyntec sued Chilisin Electronics Corp. Jude Medical S.C., 4th 1339, 1343–44 (Fed.

Art 260