Navigating the Intersection of AI and Intellectual Property Law
JD Supra Law
MARCH 5, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a game changer across various sectors, and intellectual property (IP) law is no exception. By: Planet Depos, LLC
This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.
JD Supra Law
MARCH 5, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a game changer across various sectors, and intellectual property (IP) law is no exception. By: Planet Depos, LLC
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 1, 2021
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). SecurityPoint brought its claim for patent infringement against the United States under 28 U.S.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
OCTOBER 2, 2023
million jury verdict that had previously been awarded to Teva in a patent infringement suit regarding the two companies’ development of drugs with antibodies capable of treating headache disorders associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (“CGRP”).
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
NOVEMBER 13, 2023
involves an allegation of patent infringement over United States Patent No. Court documents state the patent at issue is for a “Vessel Rinsing Apparatus,” that was issued on August 15, 2023. 11,725,369.
JD Supra Law
APRIL 5, 2024
A district court recently precluded a patent attorney from testifying as an expert in a patent infringement lawsuit where the proposed expert lacked the requisite technical expertise to assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence. By: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
SpicyIP
SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in Intellectual Property Law, Technology Law, and Corporate Law. It did so in a bid to establish patent infringement albeit Biological E Limited (“defendants”) using a different process to prepare the product.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
DECEMBER 8, 2023
They are alleging patent infringement concerning U.S. The complaint states that the Plaintiff (OP) has designed and patented an innovative orthopedic plate system explicitly made for pediatric patients. 8,777,998 , titled “Pediatric Long Bone Support or Fixation Plate.”
JD Supra Law
JUNE 1, 2022
Patent Infringement Case- The pharmaceutical company Moderna finds itself in an intense a legal battle regarding its popular Covid vaccine. Plaintiffs Arbutus Biopharma and Genevant Sciences are attempting to hold Moderna accountable for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 11, 2021
With all these various fast food restaurants entering the fray, why did Chick-fil-A or other early players in the chicken sandwich game not block these upstarts with copyright or patent infringement injunctions? A 2015 court case and trade secret law help shed some light on this question.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. Kalida, Ohio – The Plaintiff, UNVERFERTH MFG. filed suit against Silver Lake, Indiana company , PAR-KAN CO.,
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 21, 2023
DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. Patent infringement cases can be complex, and the outcome can have significant implications for both the patent owner and the accused party. Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff, Disintermediation Services, Inc.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
SEPTEMBER 6, 2022
According to the Complaint, Gleason is accused of infringing one or more claims of the 933 Patent by making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering for sale its Model 79441 Multi Position Truck. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 9, 2022
D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114 and Design Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § § 271 and 283.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 5, 2023
Nu Tsai Capital, LLC, [2023-1146] (February 17, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Lite-Netics patent-related speech, holding that the district court abused its discretion. Patent Nos. Harness IP is celebrating more than 100 years as an intellectual property law firm. patents.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
December 1, 2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s abrogation of Form 18—the model complaint that provided the minimum requirements for stating a claim of direct infringement. Following the abrogation of Form 18, patent infringement claims must satisfy the plausibility standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp.
JD Supra Law
SEPTEMBER 23, 2021
The Utility of Patents and Infringement- Patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry is a very valuable tool used, not only to protect the property rights of a potential new drug, but also, to protect a potential revenue stream large enough to allow recovery of costs associated with the development of a drug.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JUNE 25, 2021
Westwood claims it began notifying the Defendant, Local Radio Networks LLC (“LRN”), regarding its ownership of the Patents in Suit in May 2020. It appears the alleged infringement had not ceased after these communications and therefore Westwood filed suit for willful patent infringement.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 8, 2023
for patent infringement. Vieneci is accused of patent infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, TeleBrands Corporation , filed suit against Plaintiff, Vieneci Garden, Inc.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
MARCH 14, 2023
Batesville”), for patent infringement. Batesville is accused of patent infringement against Patent No.’s Richmond, Indiana –The Plaintiff, Vandor Group, Inc. Vandor”) doing business as Starmark Cremation Products , filed suit against Defendant, Batesville Casket Company, Inc.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 30, 2021
Because Social claims the Product infringes on at least Claim 1 of the ‘365 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § The case was assigned to Judge James R. Sweeney II and Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker in the Southern District of Indiana assigned Case No. 1:21-cv-01071-JRS-TAB.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 28, 2021
As Digital claims each of these components of the Product are covered by the ‘860 Patent, it is seeking damages for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § It also appears a user can store their e-signature within a document using the Product. The case was assigned to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Judge Tim A.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 9, 2021
Vaxxinova claims Elanco launched a new product family called Nuplura PH+ that allegedly infringes the Patents in Suit after Vaxxinova informed Elanco of the allegations. Therefore, Vaxxinova is seeking damages and fees for willful patent infringement of the Vaxxinova Patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 25, 2021
Johnson claims it corresponded with KMC’s CEO in July 2020 regarding actual notice of KMC’s infringement of four of the Asserted Patents, but KMC apparently continued the alleged infringement. The case was assigned to Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. 3:21-cv-00501-DRL-MGG.
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 10, 2022
The Cost of Protecting Intellectual Property- A typical scenario for a patent infringement lawsuit may begin with some potential defendant selling a product. Next thing: you must defend against a patent infringement suit. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
JD Supra Law
DECEMBER 2, 2021
TSA’s Infringement: Even with processes as seemingly obvious as loading, conveying, and stacking security trays, entities such as The Transportation Security Administration are subject to U.S. Court of Federal Claims for patent infringement. By: Caldwell Intellectual Property Law
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
NOVEMBER 24, 2023
According to the complaint, Davaus seeks legal affirmation that their product, the Kernel Keeper™ , does not infringe, is not covered by, and renders invalid the United States Patent No. ” S7 alleged that the Kernel Keeper™ infringed on their patent and demanded Davaus cease its production and sale.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 21, 2023
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patent infringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. In Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. 2021-2299, 2021-2338 (Fed.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 2, 2021
New Albany, Indiana – Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed a patent infringement suit filed by Plaintiff, Eddie M. infringed on his U.S. Green”) in March 2020 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Green, who claimed Defendants, Ara Yavruyan and Chain Vault Inc.,
IPilogue
SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
I was tasked with creating business and marketing materials for the Engineering and Technology practice group, focusing mainly on topics pertaining to patent prosecution. One of the skills I sharpened over the course of my internship was effective and accessible legal writing.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
An important takeaway from this case is that careful consideration should be given to the scope of any forum selection clauses regarding patent infringement or invalidity actions. In Nippon Shinyaku v. The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp., 422, 430 (2007); AVX Corp. on the ground of forum non conveniens.”.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 13, 2021
Cross, the Plaintiff is the owner of three design patents for convertible t-shirt designs, U.S. Patent Nos. D/580,633, D/581,136 , and D/341,471 (collectively, the “Patents in Suit”). Hammond, Indiana – Apparently, James E.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JANUARY 15, 2024
. (“Sanitary Ware” or “Plaintiff”) and Delta Faucet Company (“DFC”) illuminates the complexities faced by international entities selling products on major online platforms like Amazon , particularly concerning allegations of patent infringement.
IP Watchdog
NOVEMBER 30, 2022
A group of 25 experts in intellectual property law sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Jonathan Kanter today in support of a business review letter that the group said, “represented a legally sound and evidence-based approach in applying antitrust law to innovative commercial institutions.”
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
OCTOBER 20, 2023
for alleged patent infringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. According to the complaint, Rogue Fitness owns several design and utility patents for fitness equipment, including Patent No. Continue reading
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
An important takeaway from this case is that careful consideration should be given to the scope of any forum selection clauses regarding patent infringement or invalidity actions. In Nippon Shinyaku v. The Federal Circuit disagreed. Int’l Shipping Corp., 422, 430 (2007); AVX Corp. on the ground of forum non conveniens.”
LexBlog IP
MARCH 8, 2023
district courts, and the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); and more! district courts, and the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); and more! Design Day is co-sponsored by American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO), and the USPTO.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2023
The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decisions because the PTAB erred in its obviousness analysis and found that Axonics failed to show a motivation to combine as to Medtronic’s ‘314 and ‘756 patents. Background Medtronic sued Axonics for patent infringement.
IPilogue
AUGUST 24, 2022
Furthermore, because they do not practice or develop their manufacture, they experience no risk of patent infringement litigation themselves. . From this description alone, it seems that an NPE’s core business model infringes on the spirit of Intellectual Property law, where innovation is simultaneously protected and encouraged.
IPilogue
DECEMBER 3, 2021
Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 Intellectual Property Law & Technology Intensive Program. This prohibition originated from an old provision of the Patent Act (Section 41) interpreted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Tennessee Eastman. David Park is a 3L J.D.
Intepat
DECEMBER 26, 2023
Monitoring and safeguarding these advancements in AI technology are crucial aspects to ensure the protection of intellectual property in this evolving landscape. India, aligning its intellectual property laws with those of the US and UK, similarly does not provide protection for works generated entirely by AI.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2022
You launch your advertising campaign hoping for an increase in business – but the next thing you know, you are being sued for patent infringement in federal court. Bassfield IP LLC and the ‘053 patent. This exact scenario is happening with many companies in the food service industry.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
JUNE 13, 2023
HCM”) sued Philip Morris for patent infringement accusing Philip’s “electronic nicotine delivery system” called the IQOS system. HCM’s patent claims an electronic smoking device, that includes a limitation that recites a “combustible material reservoir” that “initiat[es] a combustion reaction in the combustible material reservoir.”
Intellectual Property Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2023
Allgenesis also asserted settlement conversations as evidence of a likelihood of litigation for patent infringement when Allgenesis brings its product to market.
Intellectual Property Law Blog
MAY 11, 2021
Indeed, and perhaps most tellingly, there are no generic versions of the Moderna vaccine, despite Moderna’s promise not to pursue patent infringement during the pandemic.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
We have resent the email to
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscriptions?
Let's personalize your content