article thumbnail

Calculation and Notable Points of Punitive Damages in Patent Infringement Disputes

JD Supra Law

That is, punitive damages may be applied to intentional infringement and serious patent infringement. That is, punitive damages may be applied to intentional infringement and serious patent infringement. By: Linda Liu & Partners

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Tidbit: Book on Patent Law by DHC Justice Prathiba M Singh Launched

SpicyIP

Singh’s book on Patent Law is finally out. Also present were foreign dignitaries, including Annabelle Bennett (Former Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Sydney), Colin Birss (Lord Justice, Court of Appeal, England and Wales), and Klaus Grabinski (President of the Unified Patent Court (EU), Luxembourg).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

New Developments in Korean Patent Law

LexBlog IP

Navigating Korean Patent Law Changes: Accelerated Examination, PTEs, and Court Decisions @media screen and (max-width: 1023px) {.thegem-vc-text.thegem-custom-642e0f5b9c76d4054{display: Additionally, changes to the criminal law provisions prosecute both design and utility patent infringement.

article thumbnail

Moderna sues Pfizer for mRNA Patent Infringement: when optics and profits reveal real issues in modern IP law usage

IPilogue

Moderna and Pfizer battle’s over the inventive process of their respective mRNA COVID-19 vaccines revisit the negative associations of profit, monopolies, and optics in patent litigation. Moderna claimed that they had registered foundational mRNA patents between 2010 and 2016. This exposes some concerns about our patent laws.

article thumbnail

Chinese Utility Models, Strengthening and Supplementing Intellectual Property Protection in China

LexBlog IP

Chinese Utility Models, Strengthening and Supplementing Intellectual Property Protection in China. Chinese Utility models can provide an alternative to invention patents and supplement them too. While most jurisdictions do not utilize utility models, they are an essential piece of Chinese intellectual property protection.

article thumbnail

Agricultural Machinery Manufacturing Company (Par-Kan) Sued for Alleged Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

LLC for patent infringemen t under U.S. Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 , 281 , 283 , 284 , and 285. 8,967,940 (“the ’940 patent”) and U.S. Kalida, Ohio – The Plaintiff, UNVERFERTH MFG. filed suit against Silver Lake, Indiana company , PAR-KAN CO.,

article thumbnail

Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement

The IPKat

In the fight against intellectual property rights (IPRs) infringements, China does not consider punitive damages as a taboo. During the validity period of the patent, one of the two defendants,** ‘Baijia store’, sold Jin’s patented products without permission. On the contrary: it has embraced them as a useful tool.