article thumbnail

Public use == “accessible to the public.”

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Bottom line in this new Minerva case — file your patent application before bringing a new product to a trade show. Minerva’s ‘208 patent claims a device for endometrial ablation and includes a 2011 priority filing date. 2007), the Federal Circuit seemed to have ruled that public use requires use.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Clarifies Public Use Bar Requirements in Win for Hologic Against Minerva

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Wednesday issued a precedential opinion clarifying the requirements for the disclosure of technology that is ready for patenting at a public event to qualify as being “in public use” for purposes of the pre-America Invents Act (AIA) public use bar under 35 USC 102(b).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

“Prior public use”: an effective ground for opposition against the grant of a European patent

Garrigues Blog

The opposition procedure for European patents, enables third parties, within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the patent, to oppose that patent at the European Patent Office (EPO). One of the most effective ways of obtaining the revocation is to prove “prior public use”.

article thumbnail

Confidentiality restrictions around clinical trials and prior public use (T 0670/20)

The IPKat

The patent was for a tablet formulation that had been given to patients in a clinical trial conducted before the patent had been filed. The question became whether the patients could be considered members of the public, and whether their participation in the clinical trial therefore constituted prior public use of the formulation.

article thumbnail

No Handling Necessary: Industry Demo Was A Public Use: Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., 2023 WL 1999900 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2023)

JD Supra Law

Be careful of showing your claimed inventions at tradeshows. Minerva”) had engaged in an invalidating public use more than one year before its patent filing. . By: Irwin IP LLP

article thumbnail

Two Recent Federal Circuit Opinions Illustrate Risk of Product Demonstrations for Patent Validity

JD Supra Law

Section 102 of the Patent Act holds that an invention may not be patented if it was in public use before the effective filing date of the patented invention. The public use bar to patenting is triggered if the invention is both “in public use” and “ready for patenting.”

article thumbnail

The Inventive Entity and Prior Publication by Another

Patently-O

Cheyer & Martin (but not Moran) file for patent protection on aspects of the OAA that were not fully disclosed within the original publication. And the Question : Does the prior publication count as prior art in an IPR obviousness analysis? A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —. (a) Duncan Parking Techs.,