Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

The Campaign Against Pharma Companies Creates New Level of Uncertainty for all Patent Attorneys Re: Duty of Disclosure and Inquiry

IP Watchdog

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Notice on the “Duties of Disclosure and Reasonable Inquiry During Examination, Reexamination, and Reissue, and for Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board” on July 29, 2022 (87 FR 45764-67), without a big reaction from the IP community.

Patent 103
article thumbnail

A Request for Grace Period for a Novelty Art Should Be Submitted Within Two Months When the Patentee Knew or Should Have Known About the Novelty Art After the Patent Application Was Filed

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. within six months before the priority date of the ’987 patent), and all the inventors of the ’987 patent are also authors of the article.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Fish Principals Named to IAM’s 2021 Strategy 300 List

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

IAM recently named four Fish & Richardson principals to the 2021 edition of “Strategy 300: The World’s Leading IP Strategists.” This exclusive list honors legal professionals across all industries who have earned a reputation for developing strategies that maximize the value of IP portfolios. 2021 IAM Strategy 300. John Dragseth.

article thumbnail

What to Know About the USPTO’s Duty of Candor Guidance Regarding FDA Submissions

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Information and statements” may include, among other items, information that “refutes, or is inconsistent with, a position that the applicant takes in” either “opposing an argument of unpatentability relied on by the Office” or “asserting an argument of patentability.”. the party has a duty to submit the information to the USPTO.”.

article thumbnail

AFCP 2.0 Extended: Your Mileage May Vary

IP Tech Blog

On October 12, 2021, the USPTO extended its program for after-final patent prosecution practice, AFCP 2.0, The USPTO initiated the “pilot” program in 2013 , to speed up prosecution and to increase contact between Examiners and applicants. Reissue applications and applications undergoing reexamination are not eligible for AFCP 2.0

Art 57
article thumbnail

AFCP 2.0 Extended: Your Mileage May Vary

LexBlog IP

On October 12, 2021, the USPTO extended its program for after-final patent prosecution practice, AFCP 2.0, The USPTO initiated the “pilot” program in 2013 , to speed up prosecution and to increase contact between Examiners and applicants. to September 30, 2022. with some frequency. treatment in any event.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Imperils Term-adjusted Patents

LexBlog IP

The Federal Circuit recently upheld the Patent Office’s decision to reject claims in four separate reexamination cases due to obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). Unless overturned, this decision will significantly affect patent families that have patents with different expiration dates.

Patent 52