Remove topics acquiescence
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Retromark Volume XIII: the last six months in trade marks

The IPKat

ICE, ICE, acquiescence maybe? The defendant attempted several defences, with the one based on statutory acquiescence under section 48(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 perhaps the most interesting – and I am definitely not saying that just because I know an appeal on this point was heard by the Court of Appeal earlier in November.

Editing 70
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 02- January 09)

SpicyIP

Bombay High Court discusses basics of Acquiescence and Honest and Concurrent use, grants interim injunction against Defendant’s use of the mark ‘Regal’. The key concepts discussed by the court in this decision pertains to the issue of acquiescence and honest and concurrent use. Case Summaries.

Trademark 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Once Again, LinkedIn Can’t Use CFAA To Stop Unwanted Scraping–hiQ v. LinkedIn

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

If a service doesn’t immediately block a scraper, even if the scraper is inconsequential, does that functionally estop the service from blocking them later due to tacit acquiescence? Contact me if you are willing to teach this topic to my Internet Law students, because today I have no clue how to help them understand the CFAA.

article thumbnail

Appealing IPR Decisions – Art. III Standing in the Context of Litigation Settlements and Licenses

LexBlog IP

In its second decision between the parties on this topic, the court has dismissed the appeal for lack of Article III standing in Apple Inc. To do otherwise, would force Apple to acquiesce in judgments it could no longer challenge. Qualcomm Inc. , No 20-1683 (Fed. 10, 2021) (“Apple II”). Background.

article thumbnail

Catching Up on Government Officials’ Censorship of Constituents on Social Media

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

You will see my interspersed comments getting more and more exasperated with the court’s blithe acquiescence to the university’s blatant viewpoint-based censorship. Depending on the topic, a post by the University can generate thousands of comments, many arriving simultaneously or in quick succession.

article thumbnail

2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 5 (Censorship & More)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

More evidence that Trump’s account was poisoning Twitter and required Twitter’s intervention, despite its long-standing acquiescence. This can be particularly challenging when this uncertainty is prolonged, and the topic has no clear authority. Tarleton Gillespie , Do Not Recommend?