[Guest post] Retromark Volume XIII: the last six months in trade marks
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
ICE, ICE, acquiescence maybe? The defendant attempted several defences, with the one based on statutory acquiescence under section 48(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 perhaps the most interesting – and I am definitely not saying that just because I know an appeal on this point was heard by the Court of Appeal earlier in November.
Let's personalize your content