The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2021

8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. as ‘People who have common traits in eating’, which from its meaning per se , did not constitute an ‘adverse effect’.

Intellectual Property 62

Intellectual Property IP Law Registration 62

The IPKat

AUGUST 14, 2021

Asia Correspondent Tian Lu summarised a recent judgment of the Beijing High People's Court on whether a sign which was the subject of an application to China's Trade Mark Office which means "Eat Clan People" carries an association with cannibalism producing an adverse effect, given the adverse effect clause of China's Trade Mark Law.

Intellectual Property 62

Intellectual Property Editing Designs Design 62

IPilogue

DECEMBER 3, 2021

As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. The justification for the prohibition is agreeable: fear of patent infringement should not deter medical practitioners from applying their exercise of skill and judgment (see Janssen v Mylan at para 53 ).

Intellectual Property Law 106

Intellectual Property Law Patent Infringement Intellectual Property Law 106

SpicyIP

AUGUST 2, 2021

Topical Highlight. She notes that the recommendations adversely impact research and education avenues, especially during a pandemic, and threaten to reduce an already rigid Section 52(1) to a footnote in the proprietary copyright regime. A Parliamentary Standing Committee Report that Challenges the Fine Balances Within the IP System.

Reporting 116

Reporting Designs Design Copyright 116

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

or LGL), seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and/or fair use for the entire Prince Series. Barton Beebe’s empirical work on this topic. Goldsmith moved for summary judgment, seeking a ruling that all of the 16 works in the Prince Series infringed her copyright. In the first, Sony Corp. of America v.

Fair Use 95

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 95

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Denials of institution – particularly the extent to which they are reviewable – have long been a contentious topic for the PTAB. The district court subsequently ruled on judgment as a matter of law that HP was estopped from arguing obviousness at trial. Institution Reviewability.

Reporting 52

Reporting Art Invention Patent 52