Remove topics parallel-proceedings
article thumbnail

EPO doubles down on opposition acceleration commitment

The IPKat

The perennial topic of anguish, anger, anxiety, annoyance, etc amongst patent attorneys and litigators, alike. Patent litigation strategists are not just plotting out their timelines of national proceedings v EPO, but also the UPC. Rule 295 also gives the power to the UPC to stay their proceedings pending the EPO.

Contracts 113
article thumbnail

On Final Day of PTAB Masters™ 2022, Iancu/Panelists Ponder the Road Ahead for USPTO and PTAB

IP Watchdog

The last day of PTAB Masters™ 2022 featured sessions on dealing with parallel litigation at the International Trade Commission (ITC) and district courts in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings; life sciences and inter partes review (IPR); and the future of the PTAB.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

PTAB Data Belies Outdated Criticisms

LexBlog IP

One directed to the frequency of so-called serial/parallel petition filings , and the other pertaining to Orange Book/Biologics patents. Serial/Parallel Filings? Parallel petitions, on the other hand, constitute 7% of PTAB filings. Why are parallel petitions much more commonplace than serial?

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Event Report: BIE Symposium raises questions on Arrow declarations in the UPC

The IPKat

Kat friends Tobias Cohen Jehoram and Emilia Zalewska were on hand to report on the proceedings for the Kat's readers. After this, they discussed a set of various topics related to the RoP and the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA). Hoyng explained that work on the code of conduct for judges is still in progress.

article thumbnail

Egyptian Case Kurasov v. Wali: Where inspiration meets imitation in the art world

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Cairo Economic Court’s Ruling For the uninitiated, the Egyptian Copyright framework is set under book three of law n o 82 of 2002 for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (Egyptian Copyright Law – ECL) where enforcement is protected through two distinct means, being civil and criminal proceedings.

Art 56
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week

The IPKat

The Tiroler Adler may fly, but the Tiroler Katze prefers to snooze The IPKat served as a platform for reporting and debate on a range of topics last week, not least through the range of guest posts published. Katfriend Henry Yang summarised the reasoning of the Court of Appeal thereto in the recent case of Autostore v Ocado.

article thumbnail

Egyptian Case Wali v. Kurasov: Where inspiration meets imitation in the art world

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Cairo Economic Court’s Ruling For the uninitiated, the Egyptian Copyright framework is set under book three of law n o 82 of 2002 for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (Egyptian Copyright Law – ECL) where enforcement is protected through two distinct means, being civil and criminal proceedings.

Art 52