topics section-102 
Patently-O
AUGUST 30, 2022
Google removed the case to Federal Court and then sought dismissal of the case–arguing that all claims asserted in the case are preempted by Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act. (a) The case ties in directly to lots of academic work on the topic. Petition for Cert. Judge Easterbrook’s 1996 decision in ProCD v.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 23, 2024
It does seem like the topic of AI and copyright was everywhere in the copyright world last year. While some digital topics have been known to cause a great commotion in copyright circles only to later sink practically without a trace, unless I am mistaken, the issue of the copyright implications of AI is different.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 28, 2023
While the decision is nonprecedential, the case allows a window into the Federal Circuit’s analysis and treatment of artificial intelligence-type claims with respect to Section 112 issues such as enablement. This topic was recently previewed in Realtime Data v. Judge Newman did not analyze the claim under Section 112.
IP Tech Blog
JANUARY 4, 2023
Section 102 of the Copyright Act specifically details that there is copyright protection for “original works of authorship” that are fixed to a “tangible medium of expression from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine.”
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 4, 2023
Section 102 of the Copyright Act specifically details that there is copyright protection for “original works of authorship” that are fixed to a “tangible medium of expression from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine.”
SpicyIP
JULY 11, 2021
Topical Highlight. In a guest post , Lokesh Vyas criticises the application of Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act for protection of IP in a PhD thesis and argues that it is a public document as per UGC guidelines which cannot be withheld from the public. IPAB Issue Finally Comes to a Conclusion: Delhi HC Creates Specialist IP Division.
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2023
The treaty section is particularly clear. Designs get comparatively little attention which is no doubt due to space limitations (the book has almost 1,500 pages excluding the tables of cases and legislation) but given the many design complexities in Europe, it is the one topic where a bit more detail would have been welcome.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
79 
Let's personalize your content