topics standalone-authority 
Velocity of Content
MARCH 10, 2022
To meet this demand, many journals now offer authors the option to feature a Plain Language Summary (often called PLS) within their article. The PLS is a concise recap of virtually any scientific publication written by authors using non-technical language that all readers can understand.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
In 2008, L&Es were established as a standalone agenda item of the SCCR. The WIPO Secretariat went back to commissioning studies and typologies, and for a year centered the discussions outside of the SCCR, convening three regional seminars and an international conference on the topic. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 12, 2021
The so-called “conditional irresponsibility” of online content-sharing service providers (OCSSPs) with regards to copyright infringements is a never-ending, vexing, and daunting topic not only for scholars (see here , here , here and here ), but also for the European Court of Justice itself (CJEU). For further lessons, stay tuned ….
IPilogue
JANUARY 14, 2022
On July 28, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal confirmed overbreadth as a standalone attack on patent validity: Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v Pfizer Canada ULC. of the Act ) must provide attribution, mentioning both the source and the name of the author. Overbreadth as an Independent Ground of Invalidity.
The IPKat
JANUARY 9, 2022
The panel discussed topics from the perspective of China, Germany, Europe, Japan, and the U.S., The panel also consisted of Ms. Jill Ge (Allen & Overy), Dr. Roberta Romano-Götsch (European Patent Office), Mr. Marcus Thymian (GrowIP Law Group), and Dr. Matthias Reischle-Park (WIPO). Maria Strong (U.S. Copyright Office), and Ms.
Trading Secrets
DECEMBER 21, 2021
The FTC is exploring whether it has the authority to ban or limit the use of non-competes in the employment setting. The panels also will considered the potential harms to workers that may addressed through the FTC’s rulemaking, law enforcement, or advocacy authority.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2021
The FTC is exploring whether it has the authority to ban or limit the use of non-competes in the employment setting. The panels also will considered the potential harms to workers that may addressed through the FTC’s rulemaking, law enforcement, or advocacy authority.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content