Kashishipr

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

The plaintiff, SSPL, had filed a lawsuit against the defendant NTC in the Bombay High Court, alleging Copyright and Trademark Infringement. In May 2007, the label mark ‘SOYA DROP’ was registered. Since then, it has been continuously used and has even acquired reputation and goodwill in the market. Concluding Remarks.

Registration 98

Registration Artistic Work Copyright Registering Trademarks 98

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Regarding non-working, the court pointed to the defendant’s purchase of the products from the plaintiff to hold that the plaintiff commercially exploited its patent by marketing them in India and thus held that the defendant was unable to establish the invalidity of the suit patent.

Patent Infringement 59

Patent Infringement Patent Art Invention 59

IPilogue

AUGUST 19, 2021

Canada’s Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act (OPMA) was enacted in 2007 and includes a list of 39 protected Olympics-related marks in Schedule 1. During her time as a trademark law professor at Drake University, Shontavia Johnson wrote that she believed the laws created solely to protect the Olympics had been stretched too far.

Intellectual Property 106

Intellectual Property Social Media IP Trademark 106

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Trademark law encapsulates such territorial jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 [1] ( hereinafter “Trademark Act”). The Court found the recitals contained in the “White Paper” issued by the defendants insufficient to conclude that they were targeting the Indian market. Conclusion.

Social Media 52

Social Media Trademark Law Marketing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 11, 2023

The Second Circuit stayed MSCHF’s appeal of the district court’s ruling that the Wavy Baby infringed Vans’ trademarks pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Jack Daniel’s v. 140 (2023), since that decision was expected to provide guidance to lower courts for resolving free speech defenses in trademark infringement cases. VIP Prods. ,

Blogging 111

Blogging Trademark Branding Brands 111

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

They are marketed through different, yet related, channels of trade (sports and entertainment, which were melded together as ESPN’s original name ). I am unaware of any reported comparison, but I did find the latter compared to a toilet flushing and have seen the former’s trademark suffer indignities at times too ).

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

Section 230(e)(2) says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property,” so IP lawsuits over third-party content are not preempted by Section 230. In 2007, the Ninth Circuit in Perfect 10 v. I even agree with the latter point!)

Intellectual Property 132

Intellectual Property Trademark Marketing Marketing 132

The IPKat

MARCH 7, 2022

Still the Circular does hold out a ray of hope, noting that- [u]nder certain circumstances, names, titles, or short phrases may be protectable under federal or state trademark laws. T]here is a compelling reason why the name or title of a book cannot be a trademark, which stems from copyright law.

Copyright 96

Copyright Trademark IP Public Domain 96

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” provid[es] an estimate of the fair market value of goods and services provided by religious organizations, and.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 23, 2023

China Bistro/ ” mark against the plaintiff’s trademark “China Bistro/ ”. The single bench, using the trite law of essential features and the average consumer test, reached the conclusion of infringement under §29(2) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (‘Act’). [2] General Mills Marketing Inc; Phonepe Private limited v.

Trademark 86

Trademark Law Marketing Marketing 86

Patently-O

DECEMBER 12, 2021

Can you register a famous person’s name as your trademark without their consent? Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. Lemley, What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law , 58 Stan. The Lanham Act seems to say no, and the U.S. Sullivan , 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). [12]

Registration 69

Registration Government Advertising Advertising 69