Patently-O

MAY 19, 2022

And the Question : Does the prior publication count as prior art in an IPR obviousness analysis? = = =. Although the Board granted the petition, it eventually concluded that the prior publication was not prior art and thus sided with the patentee in its final written decision. A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —. (a)

Invention 55

Invention Inventor Art Patent 55

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

NOVEMBER 15, 2021

Unfortunately, what is good for the sharing of information is often not good for the patenting of inventions that arise from the research and products presented at these conferences. The poster, together with information found in other sources of prior art, were enough to find the patent claims in question obvious and invalid.

Art 52

Art Invention Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

JD Supra Law

JULY 7, 2023

In 2011, Congress passed the America Invents Act, which established, among other things, a process by which a party could petition the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to review the validity of a challenged patent based on prior art publications.

Patent 52

Patent Invention Art 52

The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? In 2011, Hormel filed a patent application for the two-step process, omitting HIP’s involvement. To be a joint inventor, “a person must make a significant contribution to the invention as claimed. The court in Pannu v.

Inventor 110

Inventor Invention Art Patent 110

SpicyIP

JANUARY 11, 2022

Section 3(b) provides that “an invention the primary or intended use or commercial exploitation of which could be contrary to public order or morality or which causes serious prejudice to human, animal or plant life or health or to the environment” will not be considered an invention for the purposes of the Patents Act.

Invention 119

Invention Patent Art Patent Application 119

Patently-O

MARCH 21, 2023

We are are now at a point where it is easy to see an AI tool creating inventive output. And, even if recognition of the invention is fundamental to the inventing process, the AI tools certainly provide sufficient contribution to be considered for joint inventorship. who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention.”

Inventor 121

Inventor Invention Patent Art 121

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 19, 2021

Now that the 10th anniversary of the America Invents Act (AIA) has passed, we can look back not only at the past decade, but also the reactions of various interested parties and how they responded to that anniversary. patent laws enacted on September 11, 2011; one relating to the U.S. There were two revolutionary amendments to U.S.

Invention 72

Invention Patent Art Patent Law 72

Patently-O

APRIL 28, 2022

In particular, the original specification must show ‘possession’ of the newly claimed invention. 132(a) (“No amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention.”). 282 (as amended by AIA 2011). 282 (as amended by AIA 2011). 2010) (en banc).

Inventor 105

Inventor Invention Art Litigation 105

Patently-O

JUNE 28, 2022

When the Patent Act of 1790 refers to inventors, it lists gender inclusive forms of “he, she, or they:” [The inventor(s) must] set[] forth, that he, she, or they , hath or have invented or discovered any useful art, manufacture, engine, machine, or device, or any improvement therein… Patent Act of 1790. 881 (2011).

Patent Law 134

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 134

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? For similar reasons, science fiction is rarely cited as prior art against later patent filings. Science fiction can qualify as prior art under § 102(a) as a “printed publication” or as “otherwise available to the public.” See [link].

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 95

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

A large part of the transformation stemmed from the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 that was enacted ten years ago in September 2011. This included eliminating the date of invention as relevant to patentability and narrowing the pre-filing grace period. by Dennis Crouch. ” ” A real mess.”

Invention 81

Invention Reporting Patent Art 81

Patently-O

JANUARY 10, 2023

Articles: Colleen Chien, Janelle Barbier, and Obie Reynolds, The AIA at Ten – How Much Does the Pre-AIA Prior Art Regime Still Matter? Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas? Sarnoff, Derivation and Prior Art Problems with the New Patent Act , 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 12 ( sarnoff.2011.derivation.pdf

Journalism 55

Journalism Trademark Patent Patent Law 55

Patently-O

OCTOBER 6, 2021

2011 priority filing date). This general idea was already in the prior art, but the claims add a couple of additional features: Authentication function is normally inactive on the mobile device but is activated by the user for the transaction; and when once the transaction is done the authentication function is automatically deactivated.

Patent 121

Patent Invention Art Inventor 121

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

As is usual these days, ELCO turned-around and filed an inter partes review petition — challenging the patent’s validity based upon a 2011 product catalog (printed publication) that had featured the Hatteras lighting product. ” 35 U.S.C. ” Here, the district court found substantive, germane differences.

Invention 77

Invention Art Litigation Public Use 77

Patently-O

MARCH 7, 2024

Celanese began selling the product on the competitive market in 2011, and eventually decided to file for patent protection on its manufacturing process in 2015. A key rationale was that allowing the inventor to obtain a patent monopoly after already commercially exploiting the secret invention would improperly extend the exclusivity period.

Inventor 45

Inventor Invention Art Patent 45

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? In 2011, Hormel filed a patent application for the two-step process, omitting HIP’s involvement. To be a joint inventor, “a person must make a significant contribution to the invention as claimed.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

The IPKat

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. If the inventor has disclosed their invention during the grace period, then further disclosures by third parties also don't constitute prior art ( AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 131

Patent Inventor Patent Application Art 131

More Than Your Mark

MARCH 12, 2021

patenting courts, “new recipes or formulas for cooking food which involve the addition or elimination of common ingredients, or for treating them in ways which differ from the former practice, do not amount to invention merely because … no one else ever did the particular thing upon which the applicant asserts his right to a patent.”

Patent 52

Patent Invention Art Blogging 52

Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

On September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”). Among the changes created by the AIA, a new system was put into place for the submission of prior art to the Patent Office prior to patent issuance. Effective September 16, 2012, a third-party may submit prior art to the Patent Office.

Art 40

Art Confidentiality Patent Application Patent 40

Patently-O

MARCH 1, 2024

While the claims in each decision recite physical devices or molecules, the PTAB still found most to be ineligible as directed to an abstract idea and lacking an integrated inventive concept beyond well-understood, routine conventional activities. Decision_2022004253_02-05-2024.

Invention 68

Invention Patent Art Marketing 68

Patently-O

OCTOBER 12, 2023

Cir 2023) I was disappointed to see the Federal Circuit’s no-opinion affirmance in this case — affirming the PTAB finding that Team Worldwide’s inflatable airbed invention was unpatentable as obvious. The key prior art references in the case are U.S. However, on appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded.

Patent 68

Patent Invention Art Designs 68

LexBlog IP

JUNE 14, 2023

when] measured against dimension of the full invention,” the panel in Blue Gentian, LLC v. As made clear in the appellate opinion, a single meeting in August 2011 was central to the district court’s inventorship holding and the basis for Blue Gentian’s appeal. Tristar Products, Inc. (21-2136)

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Designs Design 52

Patentably Defined

JUNE 7, 2012

This person of ordinary skill is a hypothetical construct – an ordinarily skilled artisan who is presumed to possess ordinary creativity and to be aware of all prior art in his field of endeavor, as well as prior art that is relevant to the problem addressed by the claimed invention. 103 cannot be based on non-analogous art.

Art 40

Art Inventor Invention Patent 40

Patently-O

AUGUST 28, 2022

Patent cases regularly involve expert testimony about the how a “ person having ordinary skill in the art ” (PHOSITA) might think. 2011) (“A less sophisticated level of skill generally favors a determination of nonobviousness. by Dennis Crouch. Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc. , 3d 1314, 1323 (Fed.

Invention 79

Invention Art Patent Designs 79

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

Specifically, the Board found MacNeil was entitled to a presumption that its evidence of commercial success, long-felt need, and industry praise related to its WeatherTech® product reflective of the inventiveness of the claims of the ’186 Patent. 1, at 48 (2011). 101 as claiming only abstract ideas and no inventive concept.

Patent Law 74

Patent Law Law Patent Art 74

IP.com

JANUARY 29, 2024

The Patent Review and Approval Process The average approval rate of patent applications by the USPTO from 2011-2020 is 52.8%, meaning roughly half of all patent applications are approved, depending on the type of patent filed. While this program is an elegant evolution of the USPTO’s mission “to drive U.S.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Application Patent Technology 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 3, 2023

Moderna asserts that it pioneered these innovations years before the COVID-19 pandemic and patented them between 2011-2016. It is not clear to me the impact of this ruling, however it likely favors Pfizer’s invalidity arguments focusing on whether certain prior art references sufficiently disclose mRNA). See Phillips v.

Patent 97

Patent Patent Infringement Copying Technology 97

The IPKat

AUGUST 24, 2023

Novartis kept Mylan out of the Belgian market for a year before the Technical Board of Appeal (TBA) definitively revoked its patent in September 2011. PI refused because of a prima facie lack of inventive step President of the Dutch-speaking Enterprise Court of Brussels, 14 October 2022, Biogen v.

Litigation 52

Litigation Law Patent Invention 52

Larson & Larson

JUNE 1, 2021

Novelty is about prior art: can your examiner point to a thing already in the public domain that is practically a kissing cousin of your thing? The 2011 America Invents Act changed the appeals process a lot. Basically, everyone in the industry could come to your conclusion by reading the relevant material. The Appeals Process.

Patent 52

Patent Public Domain Inventor Invention 52

Patently-O

MARCH 1, 2023

Notably, eutectic compositions of barium fluoride and calcium fluoride were known in the prior art. The disclosure even stated: “The essential feature of the present invention is the growing of the instant bodies under controlled conditions.” [3] This line of authority is hardly obsolete. As recently as 2017, in BASF v. 3d 1360 (Fed.

Invention 122

Invention Patent Law Art 122

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JUNE 10, 2021

The court addressed the admissibility of uncorroborated testimony about prior art and whether there was a legally sufficient evidentiary basis for the jury’s invalidity determination. Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (collectively, “HP”) were sued in 2011 for infringement of U.S. Litton Sys. ,

Art 53

Art Inventor Patent Invention 53

Intepat

MAY 28, 2024

Notably, Apple trademarked its store design in the United States in 2011. Its products have influenced art, design, and popular culture, further solidifying its place as a distinct and iconic brand. did not invent the fruit and that a growers’ association should rightfully be allowed to use an apple in its logo.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52

TraskBritt Intellectual Property

MAY 27, 2021

A provisional patent application allows a patent applicant to reserve priority in an invention before committing to the full utility patent application process. If an inventor has already done the legwork to determine that the invention is worthwhile, filing a provisional patent application may be an extra and unnecessary cost.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Inventor 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 8, 2022

Eligibility : The inventive feature here is use of bit repetition to better ensure wireless signal transmission. In the litigation, Apple and Broadcom had hoped to rely upon several prior art references during litigation. This test is a based upon a statement made by Senator Kyl as the America Invents Act was being debated.

Litigation 55

Litigation Art Invention Patent 55

Intepat

NOVEMBER 2, 2023

The extensive spectrum of discussions included diverse facets, from intellectual property filings to inventions, and ventured into the complex realms of legality, ethics, and geopolitics. The number of patent submissions from India has witnessed substantial growth, more than doubling between 2011 and 2021. Ross Intelligence Inc.,

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property IP Higher Education Technology 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 24, 2022

Approvals in the European Union and Canada followed in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Thus, claiming it as an invention would appear to be at best a long shot. Instead, these claims recite adjusting doses in the presence of side effects, which clinicians routinely do, and which would have been obvious in view of the prior art.

Patent 59

Patent Marketing Marketing Invention 59

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 11, 2022

While Death clearly raises some valid concerns regarding the challenges inventors face in trying to secure effective patent scope for inventions of this type, in my view it is an overstatement to say that chemical genus claims are “dead.” patent law’s primary non-prior art-based limitations on claim scope. Abbott Laboratories , 636 F.3d

Inventor 49

Inventor Invention Patent Reporting 49