IPilogue

JULY 9, 2021

Professor David Vaver is a Member of IP Osgoode’s Advisory Board and a Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Osgoode Hall Law School. . view is accepted that the doctrine does not apply to future inventions (or, in Canada, also designs) that an employee promises to assign as a condition of employment. [7]

Intellectual Property 81

Intellectual Property Editing Intellectual Property Law IP 81

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. Brean, Senior In-House Intellectual Property Counsel, Respiratory Care, Philips. Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? Guest post by Camilla A. Compare 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Law 96

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 96

SpicyIP

JULY 22, 2023

It states that the current IP regime poses problems in the context of generic computer programs because of the way the algorithms are designed and trained using large data sets. Surprisingly, here the report does not mention any protection (or lack thereof) within the IP laws of the country.

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Reporting Government 98

IPilogue

JANUARY 10, 2022

Madelaine Lynch is a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 Intellectual Property Law & Technology Intensive Program. Part 5: The IP Hidden Gems: Trade Secrets and Industrial Designs. This has been a historically tumultuous area of patent law.

Invention 104

Invention Patent Intellectual Property IP 104

LexBlog IP

JUNE 15, 2022

1, it, he made inventive contributions and started the inventive process. 1976), or that the process of production he designed and initiated “required great skill” even if “no changes were required.” However, the characterisation of a person as an inventor is a question of law. Snyder , 536 F.

Inventor 52

Inventor Copyright Art Intellectual Property 52