article thumbnail

Patent Suits Drop 33% from 2013; 2021 Damages Awards are More Than $1 Billion less than 2012

IP Close Up

Despite the high economic relevance of innovation and explosive invention growth reflected in the number of patents issued annually by the United States Patent and Trademark Continue reading.

Patent 114
article thumbnail

The Federal Circuit Once Again Shows Its Willingness to Reject Conclusory Allegations of Inventiveness

IP Intelligence

s (“Zillow”) motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because the two International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) patents-at-issue, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,778,193 and 6,785,676 (the “’193 patent” and “’676 patent,” respectively) were directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Protection of Computer-Related Inventions : An Indian Perspective

Intepat

INTRODUCTION As technology continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, Computer-Related Inventions (CRIs) have become a crucial component of modern innovation. The Patents Act, 1970, provides for the protection of CRIs, but there has been significant debate over the years regarding the patentability of such inventions in India.

article thumbnail

Problem Statement Precision: A Key Factor in TSM-Based Non-Obviousness Determination?

SpicyIP

Controller of Patents decision on the role of PSITA in determining non obviousness, we are pleased to bring to you this post by Kevin Preji. This post attempts to critically analyse the relevance of difference in the purported function of the invention and prior art to determine non-obviousness in identifying the inventive step.

Invention 111
article thumbnail

Ambiguity Begets Ambiguity: A Legislative Attempt to Bring Clarity to Patentable Subject Matter May Bring More Confusion

JD Supra Law

Tillis introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (S.4734) 4734) in an effort to clarify which inventions are actually patentable and to codify those that are not. 66, (2012) and Alice v. On August 2, 2022, Sen. Since the Supreme Court handed down its decisions in Mayo Collaborative Services v. CLS Bank, 573 U.S.

article thumbnail

The Inventive Concept: Unclear Judicial Guidance Causes Frustration for Inventors

LexBlog IP

What is at the core of invention? All inventions boil down to applying some natural law , but where is the line between natural law and invention? ” The most recent Supreme Court case which granted certiorari with regard to an “inventive concept” is Alice Corp. By: Banks Griffin. Axle & Mfg.

article thumbnail

Part I: Diagnostic method patents in India

SpicyIP

In March 2023, the Delhi High Court will consider two significant rejections by the Patent Office (PTO) that will determine the fate of diagnostic method patents in India. This provision excludes diagnostic processes from patent protection. Both rejections have been challenged before the Delhi High Court.

Patent 103