article thumbnail

10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market

43(B)log

Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for false advertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. Nor was Vitamins Online required to prove a nexus between the false advertising and the lost sales.

article thumbnail

Dastar bars false advertising claim against "first of its kind" ads

43(B)log

6:12-CV-499, 2014 WL 11848751, (E.D. July 25, 2014), report and recommendation adopted, No. 6:12-CV-499, 2014 WL 11829325 (E.D. (Comment: “First printing” might therefore be different.) Blue Spike, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

patent misrepresentations to prospective dealer could be false advertising under Dastar/Lexmark

43(B)log

Shingle Savers counterclaimed, alleging, among other things, false advertising under the Lanham Act and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Lanham Act/ODTPA claims: First, the court declined to hold that Rule 9(b) applied to Lanham Act false advertising claims, which don’t require fraud.

article thumbnail

odd 2d Circuit case about misleadingness versus confusion

43(B)log

Somewhat oddly, the court then says: To the extent that this approach to the false endorsement claim diverges from our caselaw involving false advertising, that result is consistent with the fact that the two types of claims are distinct. See Lexmark Int’l, Inc. Static Control Components, Inc., Compare 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1)(B).

article thumbnail

Gerber's Good Start troubles continue

43(B)log

A]dvertisements that reframe critiques of a product as praise can constitute false advertising.” But “the requirement of extrinsic evidence to prove that implied assertions in ads are false is chiefly a requirement of Lanham Act false advertising claims — claims not present here.” (And

article thumbnail

Kentucky bourbon distilled in Indiana?

43(B)log

Fresh Bourbon allegedly falsely advertises that Fresh Bourbon is the “first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky,” and makes other related false claims, which is allegedly false because it’s not a distillery, which requires both federal (TTB) and Kentucky (KABC) licenses. POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.,

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2014: [link]. The court issued a preliminary injunction and the duo agreed to no longer use Vogue’s marks in connection with the album. Metaverse and NFT Filings Decrease. 2020: [link]. 2019: [link].

Trademark 130