article thumbnail

AI Inventions and Subject Matter Eligibility

JD Supra Law

In June 2014, the U.S. The Alice court articulated a two-part patent eligibility test for software inventions. Step one, known as the “filter step,” determines whether the patent claims at issue are directed to a patent-ineligible concept, such as an abstract idea. Supreme Court decided Alice Corporation Pty.

article thumbnail

The Quest for a Meaningful Threshold of Invention: Atlantic Works v. Brady (1883)

Patently-O

I thought I would write a more complete discussion of this important historic patent case. Atlantic Works has had a profound impact on the development of patent law, particularly in shaping the doctrine of obviousness, but more generally providing theoretical frameworks for attacking “bad patents.” Claims: 1.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Holds Patents Must Enable Full Scope of Invention

JD Supra Law

Sanofi that a patent’s specification must enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the full scope of the invention as defined by its claims. Amgen sued Sanofi in 2014, alleging that Sanofi had infringed its cholesterol-lowering drug patents, which disclosed 26 exemplary antibodies by amino acid sequences.

article thumbnail

And Again, Abstract Ideas are Not Patentable!

The IP Law Blog

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down many patents on the grounds that they are invalid as directed to an abstract idea, relying on the Supreme Court’s Alice decision. LEXIS 33719, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s rejection of the claims in a patent application as directed to an abstract idea.

Patent 111
article thumbnail

The Federal Circuit Once Again Shows Its Willingness to Reject Conclusory Allegations of Inventiveness

IP Intelligence

s (“Zillow”) motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because the two International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) patents-at-issue, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,778,193 and 6,785,676 (the “’193 patent” and “’676 patent,” respectively) were directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

A Prototypical Corporate Salesperson is Not Patentable!

The IP Law Blog

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals continues to strike down patents directed to abstract ideas under the Alice test for patent subject matter eligibility. LEXIS 8294, the court invalidated seven patents owned by People.ai. A patent protects an invention. 208, 216, 219 (2014). 208, 216, 219 (2014).

Patent 98
article thumbnail

Generative AI and Patent Considerations – Part Two

Intellectual Property Law Blog

A patent strategy informed by the unique considerations raised by generative AI will optimize protections for innovations in the field. Patent strategies should reflect the current legal landscape as well as anticipate potential future legal developments. Part One of this series covers claim scope and inventorship.

Patent 130