2016 Inventor Licensing Marketing 
IIPRD
MAY 9, 2024
This has led to the introduction of intellectual property rights which are a set of exclusionary rights as it excludes the world from enjoying a set of rights arising out an invention or creation, except the inventor or creator. Cross-licensing agreements can both restrain and advance competition.
SpicyIP
JUNE 22, 2022
The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) recently released an interesting report titled ‘Compulsory licensing for expensive medicines’. Ordinarily, patentees voluntarily decide whether or not and on what conditions to grant licenses to third parties. Failing which, a compulsory license can be issued. Natco Pharma Ltd.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
JULY 25, 2023
In both disputes, Justice Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court (DHC) had ordered that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) can intervene in patent licensing disputes under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act – first in 2016 ( Ericsson v. Taking guidance from earlier case law ( Ashoka Marketing Ltd.
Intepat
JUNE 9, 2023
In 2016, India introduced its National IPR Policy with the objective of stimulating creativity, protecting intellectual property, and promoting its commercialization. But first, let’s look at what the 2016 India’s National IPR Policy states. The major focus is to promote “Make in India” products.
Intepat
MAY 18, 2023
While one confers rights on inventors to encourage innovation, the other aims to eradicate monopolistic practices and encourages healthy competition in the market. Therefore, the need to obtain information as well as the license to use such technology is innately high, and this is where the concept of FRAND licensing comes in.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 3, 2023
It could be copyright infringement to continue serving photos from servers after the license expired. August 5, 2022): “the Patent Act requires an ‘inventor’ to be a natural person…only a natural person can be an inventor, so AI cannot be.” . * Evox Productions, LLC v. Verizon Media, Inc., 2K Games, Inc. ,
SpicyIP
AUGUST 23, 2023
It wasn’t a question of if they could try, it was a question of why should they try when there was no market power(!) In India, forget treatments for rare diseases, even the development of regular treatments for mass markets is an issue. and so incentives were helpful. DMD is covered under the above Act.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content