Remove 2017 Remove Advertising Remove Brands Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 1, 2017 to Apr. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”).

article thumbnail

Thousands of Pirate Sites are Listed on WIPO’s Advertising Blacklist

TorrentFreak

This is why the advertising industry is seen as an ally in the fight against piracy. In the UK , hundreds of advertising agencies began banning pirate sites, and the European Union chimed in as well. Interestingly, the MPA also reported the advertising company PopAds as a notorious piracy market.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

ALDI SÜD may not sell JOOP! and Calvin Klein perfumes

The IPKat

Owners of luxury trade marks have a strong interest in building and preserving the luxury and prestigious aura around their brands. It sells the perfumes under these brands through a selective distribution system. At the end of 2017, they acquired original JOOP! Coty claimed that the presentation and advertising of the JOOP!

article thumbnail

Descriptive mark Bike+ w/minimal marketing fails to show reverse confusion

43(B)log

Facebook advertising for the 2014 app continued until 2016 or 2019 and remained available for download; even though the Pebble Watch was discontinued in late 2016, WCT’s principal testified that “there remains a loyal following among the Pebble Watch community.” Peloton’s core brand is Peloton. Downloads declined after a 2015 peak.

article thumbnail

TM complainant fails to sink its teeth into unrelated false advertising claims

43(B)log

Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. MPL Brands, Inc., Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated false advertising claims don’t. It seems more like a concession of lack of market penetration if you have to rely on your own website and the PTO’s records to show public recognition!]

article thumbnail

[BREAKING] CJEU issues decision in Louboutin's online marketplace trade mark battle

The IPKat

In particular, this may be the case where an online marketplace displays its own logo on the advertisements of third-party sellers and it carries out the storage and shipping of the third party goods in question. For example, how is the operator displaying its advertisements (e.g., storing and shipping their products)?

article thumbnail

Two hospitals can both be best, and use purple ads (for now at least)

43(B)log

1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the false advertising claims with prejudice.