Remove 2020 Remove Licensing Remove Marketing Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Quick Links From the Past Year, Part 1 (CCPA and Privacy)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

And finally, on July 21, 2020—two months before Plaintiff’s subscription would renew—Defendant sent him an email reminder that he had to cancel his subscription if he did not want the automatic renewal to occur. SayGames LLC, 2020 WL 379165 (N.D. Voodoo SAS v. Code § 1798.100 et seq. Other Stuff. *

Privacy 99
article thumbnail

A Comprehensive Look at Data Privacy

LexBlog IP

data privacy : what businesses NEED TO know. Keeping pace with the state of data privacy and data privacy regulations is becoming a pressing responsibility for businesses in the digital age. Data privacy legislation is on the rise, with jurisdictions adopting stricter protective measures on a national and global front.

Privacy 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-05-02

Barry Sookman

Neutron – Technology & Marketing Law Blog [link] 2020-04-26 Changes Result in the Alberta Electronic Transactions Act Applying to Employment and Other Records [link] 2020-04-26 Redbox’s Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)-Wilson v.

Privacy 52
article thumbnail

There’s More to Copyright Than Financial Incentives, Internet Archive Argues in Court

TorrentFreak

The organization doesn’t license authorized digital copies from publishers; instead, its books are scanned and digitized in-house. They filed a lawsuit in 2020 equating IA’s controlled digital lending operation to copyright infringement. Thousands of libraries have digital lending services but IA’s approach is different.

Copyright 115
article thumbnail

X Corp. v. Bright Data is the Decision We’ve Been Waiting For (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In order to answer that question, the court used a framework that the Second Circuit set forth in its 2020 decision in In Re Jackson (which I asked /begged courts to do). While this conflict might seem minor (X’s users, after all, are not in the business of granting scraping licenses), the next one was not: Fair use. The post X Corp.

Blogging 127
article thumbnail

Apple Prevails on “Epic” Antitrust Claim

The IP Law Blog

Today, Apple has about a 15% market share of the global smartphone market, with more than 1 billion iPhone users. In 2010, Epic agreed with Apple to a Developer Program Licensing Agreement (DPLA) that was standard for developers to distribute apps to iOS users.

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Upholds “Sign-in-Wrap”–Keebaugh v. Warner Bros.

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court also says the disclosure was sufficiently conspicuous: Directly beneath the operative Play button is the following: “By tapping ‘Play’ I agree to the Terms of Service” or “By tapping ‘Play’ I accept the Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy,” depending on the app’s version. Obviously, Warner Bros. could have done better.