Remove 2021 Remove Contracts Remove False Advertising Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.

article thumbnail

YouTube Isn’t Liable for User Uploads of Animal Abuse Videos–Lady Freethinker v. YouTube

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A Rather than engaging this contract law issue directly, the court rules for YouTube on Section 230 grounds: Lady Freethinker’s claims ultimately seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of content provided by another information content provider.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Alleging sponsorship/endorsement confusion can't defeat clear nominative fair use

43(B)log

City of Pasadena, 2021 WL 3553499, No. 12, 2021) For over a century, PTRA has hosted the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl Game as part of its annual New Year’s Day Celebration. It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement.

article thumbnail

Pandemic ski resort closures allow both contract and advertising claims

43(B)log

2021 WL 2633326, No. 25, 2021) Unlike the education cases so far, this pandemic case sustains both consumer protection and contract claims. Defendants first argued that passes didn’t not qualify as “goods or services” under the CLRA, but were only temporary licenses, with services provided only ancillary to the license.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] BAYC sues Ryder Ripps over unauthorized minting of NFTs

The IPKat

On 24 June 2022, BAYC sued Ryder Ripps, a conceptual artist and NFT creator for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, cybersquatting and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. This is a U.S NFTs – still subject to “old” IP law An NFT is a non-fungible (i.e. Ether (USD 1+ million).

article thumbnail

Second Circuit Rejects an Account Termination Lawsuit…Again (Phew!)–Domen v. Vimeo

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for false advertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. Certain claims sounding in contract or tort may be beyond the reach of Section 230(c)(2)’s protection from suit. amended opinion July 21, 2021). See, e.g., E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v.

article thumbnail

Amending Your TOS? Better Use a Clickthrough Process, Not Email Notice–Alkutkar v. Bumble

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for false advertising. In January 2021, Bumble sought to add an arbitration clause to its TOS. Bumble successfully redirects the case to arbitration based on its TOS. Alkutkar joined Bumble in 2016.