article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.

article thumbnail

Another "buy" button lawsuit over digital licenses continues

43(B)log

15, 2024) This putative class action alleged that Amazon overcharged and “[d]eceived consumers by misrepresenting that it was selling them Digital Content when, in fact, it was really only licensing it to them[.]” The court disagreed: there’s a plausible difference in value between owning outright versus purchasing a revocable license.

Licensing 114
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

claims about legality of insurance service are falsifable

43(B)log

Route sued for breach of contract, commercial disparagement and defamation per se, intentional tortious interference with contractual relations, false advertising, and contributory trademark infringement. The breach of contract claim survived. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium.

article thumbnail

Pandemic ski resort closures allow both contract and advertising claims

43(B)log

25, 2021) Unlike the education cases so far, this pandemic case sustains both consumer protection and contract claims. Defendants first argued that passes didn’t not qualify as “goods or services” under the CLRA, but were only temporary licenses, with services provided only ancillary to the license. Alterra Mountain Co.,

article thumbnail

Alleging sponsorship/endorsement confusion can't defeat clear nominative fair use

43(B)log

It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. This also got rid of the breach of contract claim, which was based on the alleged trademark infringement and false advertising.

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

The defendant was initially given “complete and exclusive licensing rights in and to [the selected mares] and all cloned foals.” Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss.

article thumbnail

crypto lender plausibly violated UCL via unlawfulness and deceptiveness

43(B)log

The false advertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., In addition, Jeong alleged that Nexo violated the unlawful prong of the UCL by offering loans in California despite lacking a California Finance Lender (CFL) License.