article thumbnail

Press release touting preliminary injunction can found false advertising counterclaims

43(B)log

10, 2023) Zest sued defendants for trademark/trade dress infringement, alleging that defendants’ DESSLoc suite of denture attachment products infringed the trademarks and trade dress of their Locator product suite. Geryon Ventures, LLC, 2023 WL 2903668, No. 22-CV-230 TWR (NLS) (S.D.

article thumbnail

facially plausible false advertising claim can be added to TM complaint

43(B)log

Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No. 27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and false designation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a false advertising claim.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Dastar doesn't bar allegedly false advertising about source of planned development services

43(B)log

Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. Defendants' letter allegedly copied text from LStar Trademark infringement: LStar never specified what its trademarks or service marks were. LStar didn’t plead its own trademark use. LStar Development Gp., 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. Not every word on a label or ad is a mark.

article thumbnail

false advertising & bankruptcy law: $18 million for deceptive campaign in violation of automatic stay

43(B)log

2021) Plaintiffs/Debtors argued, and the court held in relevant part, that defendants (Charter) breached the automatic stay by a literally false and intentionally misleading advertising campaign to induce the Debtors’ customers to terminate their agreements with the Debtors by telling them that bankruptcy risked impairment of their service.

article thumbnail

counting chickens: should disgorgement be harder for false advertising than for TM?

43(B)log

2021 WL 4460806, No. 29, 2021) The Clorox defendants sell dietary supplements using the raw materials provided by Certified’s competitor, Avicenna. 18-cv-0744 W (KSC) (S.D. As a reminder, §1117(a) specifically also says “a violation under section 1125(a)” immediately after the quoted words.

article thumbnail

TM complainant fails to sink its teeth into unrelated false advertising claims

43(B)log

CV 20-9482-DMG (ASx), 2021 WL 4134841 (C.D. 6, 2021) VFB sued MPL for Lanham Act, UCL, and FAL violations based on MPL’s “vampiro” cocktail. Unsurprisingly, the trademark claims survive a motion to dismiss, but associated false advertising claims don’t. MPL Brands, Inc.,

article thumbnail

TM claimant may add false advertising claims as direct competitor

43(B)log

Roach, 2021 WL 4134836, No. 1, 2021) Entrepreneur, a frequent trademark claimant, sought to amend its complaint and add new parties to the TM claims here. Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for false advertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.” Entrepreneur Media, Inc.