2022 Contracts False Advertising Licensing 
43(B)log
NOVEMBER 23, 2022
SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 12, 2022
Meeker, 2022 WL 6507718, NO. 19, 2022) Judge Cannon has done some other stuff, too. The defendant was initially given “complete and exclusive licensing rights in and to [the selected mares] and all cloned foals.” La Dolfina S.A., 20-82231-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart (S.D. Plaintiffs raise allegedly awesome polo ponies.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
AUGUST 25, 2022
2022 WL 3590329, No. 22, 2022) Nexo’s Crypto Credit service allows users to take out loans against cryptocurrency collateral. The false advertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., The court now found the breach of contract claim sufficiently pled.
The IPKat
JUNE 27, 2022
On 24 June 2022, BAYC sued Ryder Ripps, a conceptual artist and NFT creator for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, cybersquatting and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. This is a U.S NFTs – still subject to “old” IP law An NFT is a non-fungible (i.e.
43(B)log
AUGUST 5, 2022
CV-21-00228-TUC-SHR, 2022 WL 3098042 (D. 4, 2022) Frequent IP claimant Lisa Frank is in court this time over a failed deal with a vegan cosmetics company, whose contract aspects I will ignore. To say we are disappointed by the events that transpired as a result of this license is an understatement. Glamour Dolls Inc.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 10, 2023
DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal false advertising law. DealMaker noted that Issuance’s own terms include a provision that allows Issuance to license its data. Defendants offered examples of contracts that, they argued, had a fee structure of 8-10%.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 9, 2022
False Advertising. In general, courts should not permit a false advertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. 2022 WL 4021776 (N.D. Implications.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
99 
Let's personalize your content