article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived. AHBP LLC v. More surprisingly (perhaps the court wanted to be sure it retained jurisdiction regardless of diversity?),

article thumbnail

False advertising about a bankrupt competitor doesn't violate the automatic stay

43(B)log

2022 WL 5245633, No. 6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that false advertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. Windstream has a 2-year contract. With Spectrum there are no contracts.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Monster wins permanent injunction against VPX in false advertising case

43(B)log

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their false advertising.”

article thumbnail

detailed examination of harm story dooms FedEx's false advertising claim

43(B)log

As alleged, Each ISP’s contract grants it a certain service area, or “route,” and the ISP is permitted to sell its route to another entity if they can agree on terms. Together they are known as CSPs, contracted service providers. But the relevant dates didn’t match; the letter at issue was released in July 2022.

article thumbnail

sending emails under former employees' names may be reverse passing off

43(B)log

CCM counterclaimed for abuse of process and for violations of the Lanham Act and related state laws; one ex-employee also brought counterclaims against loanDepot for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived.

article thumbnail

Sweepstakes rules trump arbitration agreement, 9th Circuit affirms

43(B)log

4th -, 2022 WL 17726673, No. 16, 2022) Affirming the district court , the court of appeals agreed that Coinbase’s arbitration agreement didn’t cover claims based on a sweepstakes it ran, which had a separate set of rules that didn’t compel arbitration. Issues of contract formation may not be delegated to an arbitrator.

article thumbnail

failure to properly allege falsity dooms FedEx at 6th Circuit

43(B)log

2024) The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of FedEx’s false advertising claims (under the Lanham Act and Tennessee Consumer Protection Act), albeit on somewhat different grounds. Collectively they’re called “contracted service providers” (CSPs). Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. Route Consultant, Inc., 23-5456, F.4th