article thumbnail

alleged misrepresentation of partnership/approval suffices for false advertising claim

43(B)log

2023 WL 8586681, No. 8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into false advertising cases? Tundra solicits sellers on Faire’s platform to provide their Faire Direct links to retailers registered with Tundra by “promising to promote their brands to new retailers and give them greater exposure” to Tundra retailers.

article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

Lei, 2023 WL 6373073, No. 21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. In December 2020, Deetsch notified Amazon of his patents through the Brand Registry portal and asked Amazon to remove the Lei defendants’ products. 22-cv-1166-RSH-BLM (S.D.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

no disgorgement under state law when false advertising wasn't shown to result in sales

43(B)log

BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, 2023 WL 3004625, No. 19, 2023) Previous discussion. A jury found that defendant HBI engaged in unfair competition and violated the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (IUDTPA” in its packaging and promotional activities for its RAW Organic Hemp branded tobacco rolling paper products.

article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”). 1, 2017 to Apr.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat False Advertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v. Amazon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to false advertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” This argument has failed so many times. See, e.g., the cited Ynfante v. Google opinion. ” Cites to Perfect 10 v.

article thumbnail

Dastar bars federal anticopying claims, but not state ones?

43(B)log

3d -, 2023 WL 371035, No. 24, 2023) WS sued Wayfair, alleging patent infringement, Lanham Act false advertising, Massachusetts and California statutory unfair competition and Massachusetts false advertising based on alleged copying of West Elm products. Wayfair Inc., 1:21-12063-PBS (D.

article thumbnail

YouTube Defeats Trademark Lawsuit–Lops v. YouTube

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

He alleges that YouTube sold items under the “Confidence Empire” brand and published videos from a dance troupe named Confidence Empire (maybe this one ?). YouTube, LLC, 2023 WL 2349597 (D. March 3, 2023). Leonel Lops claims a trademark in the term “Confidence Empire” for shoes. Case Citation : Lops v.