Patently-O

APRIL 20, 2024

by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running design patent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. 21, 2024) (question paraphrased). Columbia’s design patent claims an “ornamental design of a heat reflective material” as shown in the figures. 23-1052 (U.S.

Design Patent 67

Design Patent Art Designs Design 67

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 4, 2024

by Dennis Crouch On Monday, February 5, 2024, the Federal Circuit will sit together for the first time in years to hear an en banc patent case. GM Global Technology Operations LLC , the court will consider whether to apply a more stringent obviousness test to design patents. Teleflex also applies to design patents.

Design Patent 51

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 51

JD Supra Law

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

design patents. They both are part of ongoing sagas—one that has been pending for a decade and one that will be heard en banc in February 2024. In 2023, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued three opinions regarding U.S. The three 2023 opinions are Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. LKQ Corporation v.

Design Patent 66

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 66

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 24, 2023

1] LKQ, an auto parts repair vendor for GM, successfully petitioned for inter partes review of GM’s design patent for a front fender design, [2] arguing it was anticipated by a prior art reference (Lain) and obvious over Lian alone or in combination with a brochure for the 2010 Hyundai Tucson. GM Global Tech.

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 52

JD Supra Law

MAY 14, 2024

Seirus Innovative Accessories—which narrowed the scope of the Egyptian Goddess test and indicated that logos may be considered in an assessment of a design—and LKQ Corp. GM Global Technology Operations LLC, in which oral arguments were held on February 5, 2024, and relating to the appropriate legal standard for design patent obviousness.

Designs 58

Designs Design Design Patent Technology 58

IP Law 360

JANUARY 1, 2024

A rare patent case taken up by the full Federal Circuit that has the potential to weaken design patents, and U.S. Supreme Court challenges to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's authority are among the patent cases attorneys will be tracking this year.

Patent 40

Patent Design Patent Designs Design 40

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

AUGUST 23, 2023

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) has announced that effective January 1, 2024, most official fees will be increasing by 25%. On the patent side, the increase in the fees will be applicable to standard entity size. Thus, small entity patent applicants will only experience CIPO’s regular annual fee increase in 2024.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Patent Application Intellectual Property Law Designs 52

IP Watchdog

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

On February 5, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held its en banc oral argument to reconsider the obviousness test for design patents. Overall, the many judges’ questions indicated a hesitancy to change the current law, as they expressed concern with positions advanced by the patent challenger.

Designs 59

Designs Design Design Patent Patent 59

The TTABlog

MARCH 5, 2024

Once again, the existence of a patent established the functional benefits of the design: it "enables the user to secure the holster within the waistband, and the gun within the holster, with minimal bulkiness and weight and with maximum comfort." 90518181 (February 27, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C.

Design Patent 70

Design Patent Designs Design Trademark 70

Patently-O

JANUARY 22, 2024

Feb 6 12noon EST – Debating Design Patent Obviousness – Streaming via Suffolk – Free Event ( REGISTER HERE ) : The Federal Circuit has not held an en banc rehearing in a patent case since before COVID. The first one (and only one on the docket) is the important design patent obviousness case of LKQ v.

Design Patent 62

Design Patent Government Designs Design 62

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2024

Regeneron seeks a PI schedule to “ensure an orderly process that will result in resolution of its forthcoming motion for PI before May 17, 2024,” when its regulatory exclusivity period ends. A status conference took place today January 5, 2024 in relation to Regeneron’s emergency motion. Patent Nos. Patent Nos.

Litigation 52

Litigation Design Patent Designs Design 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 21, 2024

YouTube Uploaders Listed on Schedule A , 2024 WL 189013 (N.D. 17, 2024) * * * Bonus 1: The court issued a related ruling, Viral DRM LLC v. Onyshchuk , 2024 WL 189011 (N.D. This is a design patent SAD Scheme case. For this and many other reasons, I reiterate: #StopTheSADScheme. Case Citation : Viral DRM LLC v.

Copyright 78

Copyright Design Patent Trademark Designs 78

Patently-O

APRIL 3, 2024

The NPRM would also hike design patent filing and issuance fees. The USPTO notes that no maintenance fees are owed on design patents and that the USPTO has been subsidizing design patent examination with revenue from the utility patent side. It is unclear how this proposal benefits the USPTO.

Patent Prosecution 51

Patent Prosecution Design Patent Designs Design 51

The IPKat

MARCH 29, 2024

On 29 February 2024, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) released a report on “ Emerging public perceptions of intellectual property in UK media ” authored by fellow Kat Hayleigh Bosher.

Intellectual Property 62

Intellectual Property Social Media Reporting Registration 62

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The USPTO is officially establishing a separate design patent practitioner bar with its final rule published on November 16, 2023 and effective January 2, 2024. Currently, a single patent bar governs registration for anyone seeking to practice before the USPTO in utility, plant, and design patent matters.

Design Patent 109

Design Patent Designs Design Graphic Design 109

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 2, 2024

GM Global Technology to rule on the issue of whether the current test for determining obviousness of design patents, i.e., the Rosen/Durling Standard, is proper in view of the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. The en banc case will be held on February 5, 2024 and will be available for streaming here. Hunter Mfg.,

Design Patent 52

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

Last week, the Federal Circuit decided to consider, en banc , whether the Supreme Court’s 2007 KSR decision regarding obviousness overruled the Federal Circuit’s decades-old Rosen and Durling tests for design patents, setting in motion a potential lowering of the bar for obviousness. In re Rosen , 673 F.2d 3d 100 (Fed.

Design Patent 40

Design Patent Designs Design Patent 40

Patently-O

JANUARY 23, 2024

2, 2024), ECF 76. Additional observations : This case is a good example of why patent litigation is a poor fit for the Schedule A litigation model. I’ve written here before about how design patent infringement is ill-suited to ex parte adjudication; so too is utility patent adjudication. 1:23-cv-02605 (SDNY Jan.

Litigation 85

Litigation Settlement Patent IP 85

Patently-O

APRIL 12, 2024

For the DLT, negotiations have been stalled for the past several years over an African Group proposal that would permit countries to require design applicants to disclose the origin of traditional knowledge, cultural expressions and genetic resources used in creating protectable designs. [2] In the US, these are design patent rights.

Designs 40

Designs Design Law Registration 40

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

APRIL 28, 2024

The plaintiff alleged that the defendants’ dining chairs or barstools infringed two of plaintiff’s design patents. April 24, 2024) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TRO–SEC v. Case Citation : Wang v. Schedule A Defendants , No. 24-cv-759 (N.D.

Patent 84

Patent Patent Troll Blogging Trademark 84

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 23, 2023

However, the court directed the defendants to pay INR 13 lakhs to the Plaintiff and instructed that any unsold cans post January 31, 2024 shall be destroyed. This was subjected to the condition that the defendants pay an additional sum of Rs. 20,00,000 plus GST. Fsn E-Commerce Ventures Ltd &Anr. 2- Nykaa E-Retail Pvt.

Designs 52

Designs Design Music IP 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

Eventually, Johnson and Johnson announced that it would no longer enforce their patents for Bedaquiline (brand name: Sirturo) which is used in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in 134 low- and middle-income countries. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124