Intepat

OCTOBER 7, 2022

In this post, we’ll examine Copyright and Design Rights, two key forms in IPR. This would enable a person to determine the extent of each and take the necessary steps to safeguard their work. Copyright laws protect the expression of creative ideas and not just the idea. an article made with artistic skill.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Designs Design Artwork 52

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

First of all, in terms of copyright, to reiterate our very clearly articulated position. sophisticated generative AI that’s enabled by large language models, which trains on our intellectual property, violates copyright law in several ways. copyright law really doesn’t seem to give UMG a ton of options.

Music 85

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 85

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

6] The Supreme Court’s ruling on that petition—and a possible eventual decision on the merits—could have enormous implications for the art world and other industries impacted by copyright law. Originals” [7] : The Works at Issue. It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12] 5 (quoting Google , 141 S.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

TorrentFreak

MAY 17, 2022

Whether it always performs as advertised is up for debate but there are videos showing it in action on Amazon and other platforms quickly downloading files, rather than attempting to record the screen. Anyone who breaches their legal agreement with a platform is, at a minimum, in breach of relevant contract law. Copyright Law and DRM.

Copying 117

Copying Social Media Licensing Technology 117

The IPKat

JANUARY 18, 2023

The claim is for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, cybersquatting, and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. In this post, the most interesting parts of Ryder Ripps’ answer, defence and counterclaim , filed on December 27, 2022 will be analyzed.

Artwork 82

Artwork Contracts False Advertising Art 82

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

OCTOBER 19, 2021

It’s not possible to “trespass” an intangible asset; any legal protection for the asset comes from contract law (but the plaintiffs gave a license) or IP law, such as copyright law, which the plaintiffs aren’t invoking. Google responds that whatever it means, it’s preempted by copyright law.

Licensing 91

Licensing Copyright Contracts Advertising 91

IP Tech Blog

MARCH 18, 2022

Most NFTs are protected under US Copyright Law as creative works and/or may be derivative works based on pre-existing copyright-protected works. StockX responded that its NFTs are permissible trademark “fair use” as part of its retail sales and advertising of authentic NIKE sneakers.

Trademark 62

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Branding Brands 62

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 31, 2023

Copyright Office , “Permission from the copyright owner of a preexisting sound recording is not necessary when interpolating a musical work, regardless of how similar the new recording may be to an old recording. The Copyright Office is referring to 17 U.S.C. § But Astley isn’t suing for copyright infringement.

Music 97

Music Copyright Licensing Copyright Infringement 97

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

ii] Existing copyright law is ineffective in its application to new forms of digital media. ” How Stagnant Copyright Law is Stifling Creativity , 27 J. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] 277 (2020). [iv] iv] Maxwell L. Stearns, Todd J. Zywicki & Thomas J.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

LexBlog IP

MARCH 18, 2022

Most NFTs are protected under US Copyright Law as creative works and/or may be derivative works based on pre-existing copyright-protected works. StockX responded that its NFTs are permissible trademark “fair use” as part of its retail sales and advertising of authentic NIKE sneakers.

Trademark 52

Trademark Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Branding 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

We, who have been writing and teaching about copyright law and how it has responded to challenges posed by new technologies for decades, were among those who submitted comments, see [link]. In addition, conduct that may be consistent with the copyright laws nevertheless may violate Section 5. That is far too hasty.

Copyright 96

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 96

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 12, 2024

.” The Kremen test is so obviously ill-fitting to this inquiry, but the court gets to the right place: “there is no cognizable property interest in website copies that may serve as the basis for a trespass to chattels claim under California law.” mobile device screen.” That lawsuit also failed.

Copying 77

Copying Ownership Derivative Work Contracts 77

Kluwer Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 8, 2021

Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts. 1) The Rise of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the Role of Copyright Law – Part II by Peter Mezei , João Pedro Quintais , Alexandra Giannopoulou and Balázs Bodó. In this Part II we discuss copyright law aspects of NFTs, with a focus on the EU copyright acquis.”

Blogging 52

Blogging Non-Fungible Tokens Law IP 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 3, 2023

Originality is the quality that distinguishes produced or invented works from copies, clones, forgeries, or derivative works by being new or novel. It does demand, however, that no part of the work be plagiarised. It must be the author’s original work. can have copyright.

Copyright 88

Copyright Public Domain Copying Publishing 88

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

In Europe and the United States at least, every trademark has at least three purposes: (1) It identifies the origin of a product or service; (2) It guarantees consistent quality of that good or service; (3) It serves as symbolic communication as a basis for publicity and advertising. copyright law. ” Welsh (2015) at 134.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

In a ruling reminiscent of a case I’ve previously discussed involving “Sherlock Holmes,” the court held that any copyrights Harvey still held in its later derivative works couldn’t be used to enlarge the scope of protection for works already in the public domain. McDonald’s Corp.

Copyright 144

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 144

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 10, 2024

” Thus, there are some copyright arguments or policies in play beyond those most immediately considered in the motion papers. ” Thus, there are some copyright arguments or policies in play beyond those most immediately considered in the motion papers. As Professors Post and Rothman described it (at 106 and fn.

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Government Intellectual Property 52