article thumbnail

From Open Access to Open Science; as open as possible as closed as necessary?

The IPKat

Under international treaties and legislation, it is not possible to create an autonomous scientific author whose works would merit different IP conditions from the ‘all rights reserved’ default rule. An Office for Free Intellectual Property Rights and Open Science should be created.

article thumbnail

Getting paid to play? Copyright, contract, and the rewards for UGC

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The existence of this dialectical relationship between rightsholder and user sits at odds with the principles of the copyright system which often assume a dichotomous, all-rights-reserved model of creativity. Commercial’ use is instead more narrowly construed by game publishers to mean use for the benefit of a company (e.g.,

Contracts 117
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Protecting Commercial AI Rights Is Harder Than You Think – EU Edition

Velocity of Content

In the quaint days of 2019, when the EU issued its Digital Single Market Copyright Directive (DSM) , much attention was focused on issues such as a news publishersright and the obligations of platforms to take down infringing materials. What about the words “all rights reserved?” Doubtful, but murky.

Editing 59
article thumbnail

A Brave New World: The NCAA’s New NIL Policy and the Need for Federal Legislation

LexBlog IP

Published in Landslide , Vol. All rights reserved. After decades of the NCAA reaping the benefit of college players, their labor, and their name, image, and likeness (collectively, NIL), the NCAA has changed its policy and allowed players to market their NIL without sacrificing their amateur status. ©2022.

article thumbnail

A Brave New World: The NCAA’s New NIL Policy and the Need for Federal Legislation

The IP Law Blog

Published in Landslide , Vol. All rights reserved. After decades of the NCAA reaping the benefit of college players, their labor, and their name, image, and likeness (collectively, NIL), the NCAA has changed its policy and allowed players to market their NIL without sacrificing their amateur status.

Law 52