Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

A Request for Grace Period for a Novelty Art Should Be Submitted Within Two Months When the Patentee Knew or Should Have Known About the Novelty Art After the Patent Application Was Filed

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. The novelty art is an article published within the grace period (i.e., 201310567987.0 (the 201310567987.0 (the 1] See , [link].

Art 52
article thumbnail

Proving Printed Publications

Patently-O

Folks continue to file anonymous ex parte reexaminations. Design Patent No. The reexamination examiner agreed with the challenge and issued a final rejection that the claimed design was anticipated by four different prior art references. D810,925 (“breast pump”). Door-Master Corp. Yorktowne Inc. ,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Cellect or Reject? SCOTUS Asked to Consider Fate of ODP Doctrine

Patently-O

May 20, 2024), Cellect argues that the Federal Circuit erred in upholding the PTAB’s (PTAB) invalidation of Cellect’s four patents based on the judicially-created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). As a result, the patents had staggered expiration dates. Meanwhile, Dir. Cellect Cert.

article thumbnail

Double Patenting and Patent Term Adjustment

Patently-O

28, 2023) regarding how Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) interacts with terminal disclaimers and obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). This case establishes binding precedent that a terminal disclaimer cuts off any extended patent term granted through PTA. Thus, PTE extends beyond a disclaimed term, while PTA does not.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Patent Interferences May Not Involve Pure AIA Patent

LexBlog IP

The Patent Office is not supposed to issue separate patents for the same invention to competing inventors. Several statutory provisions empower the Office to reject pre-AIA patent application claims of the later inventor. But sometimes it’s not clear who is the later inventor. What did the Board do?

Patent 52
article thumbnail

New PTAB Bill to Drive 101 Compromise?

LexBlog IP

Also yesterday, some of the very same senators introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023. The co-introduction of these bills suggests a plan to drive compromise on patent eligibility. Tech industry than the liberalized 101 standard of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.),Thom

article thumbnail

Human vs AI Analysis of USPTO Updates – How Does Bard Fare?

IP Tech Blog

There has been pervasive use of Generative AI over the past few months, to create essays, works of art, music, and even source code for computer programs, as well as to take standardized examinations such as the LSAT, classroom exams, and even bar exams. A sample of this new eGrant patent is available here. 35 U.S.C. §