SpicyIP

JULY 5, 2021

Volvo, to argue that there has been a trend in these cases wherein giant companies go after smaller companies and start-ups with a collection of baseless arguments, in a bid to broaden the scope of their brand and cash in on the consequential benefits that flow from the same. attempting to restrain imports of Vivint Smart Home Inc.’s

Intellectual Property 105

Intellectual Property Trademark Licensing Copyright 105

IPilogue

OCTOBER 19, 2022

There isn’t in the United Kingdom, but the Federal Court in Bell Can ada v L3D Distributing Inc (INL3D) 2021 FC 832 (“ L3D Distributing ”) thought there was in Canada and the defendants had done it. US courts have gone this far ( MGM Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd 545 US 913 (2005)) but the UK Supreme Court has not.

Copyright Infringement 106

Copyright Infringement Copyright IP Designs 106

43(B)log

DECEMBER 1, 2022

MGFB Properties, Inc. Viacom Inc, No. MGFB has a federal registration for FLORA-BAMA for “bar and restaurant services” and several entertainment services, including “social entertainment events,” live musical performances, and “competitions for fish throwing.” New Life Art, Inc., 21-13458 (11th Cir. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d

Artistic Work 64

Artistic Work Television Trademark Trademark Law 64

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 9, 2022

Software Inc., Software Inc. (“Applicant”) develops sales systems, telemedicine systems and enterprise resource planning systems. It is one of the largest music streaming service providers with over 406 million monthly active users, including 180 million paying subscribers. Spotify AB v. 2022 USPQ2D 37 (TTAB 2022).

Television 40

Television Music Advertising Advertising 40

Copyright Lately

DECEMBER 29, 2021

Walt Disney Company. Sinclair Broadcast Group. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. More importantly, a district court judge has a significant gatekeeping role to play when it comes to ensuring that basic building blocks of lyrics and music remain free for all to use. In a July 2021 order in Nicklen v.

Copyright 117

Copyright Fair Use Social Media Copying 117

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years. Meta, nonprofit end U.S.

Designs 52

Designs Design Trademark Cease and Desist 52

Velocity of Content

DECEMBER 6, 2023

To what extent is training material first collected by third-party entities (such as academic researchers or private companies)? ROSS Intelligence Inc., Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., And, as reinforced by the recent Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. TVEyes, Inc.,

Copyright 98

Copyright Fair Use Licensing Copying 98

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

This judgment of the Delhi High Court distinguishes between cases where underlying works are used in the context of the broadcast of sound recordings versus other situations such as live performances. The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

Duck Boat Tours, Inc. ’” (quoting In re General Electric Broadcasting Company, Inc., ’” (quoting In re General Electric Broadcasting Company, Inc., exclusively with a single, albeit anonymous, source.’” 199 U.S.P.Q. 560, 563 (Tr. .” 199 U.S.P.Q. 560, 563 (Tr.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

IIPRD

DECEMBER 28, 2021

As a result of technological improvements, the music industry has evolved considerably during the last few decades. Piracy, for example, has always been a problem in the music industry, but the nature of the problem has changed over time. MUSIC STREAMING PLATFORMS AND ENFORCEMENT OF IPR. record companies and broadcasters).

Music 40

Music Intellectual Property Copyright Copyright Law 40

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

Entertainment Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Netflix Studios, LLC, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. Relying extensively on the rationale of the Single Judge’s order, the Division Bench held that Section 31D specifically deals only with Radio and Television Broadcasting. Warner Bros.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2023

In this case, the plaintiff is a publishing company that claimed that defendant No. Case: Burger King Company Llc vs Virendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. Case: Honeywell International Inc Vs The Controller General Of Patents on 19 April, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Image from here. Lakhs payable towards the Plaintiff. Zlib.Org And Ors.

Confidentiality 105

Confidentiality Trademark Copyright Patent 105

LexBlog IP

APRIL 20, 2022

— Career Group Companies. In a recent post , I’d written about the Petition For Writ Of Certiorari filed November 15, 2021, in Jim Olive Photography, d/b/a Photolive, Inc., It is a chance to reorganize and refresh your workspace and your workflow. Don’t believe us? Read on to learn why. 21-735 (2021).

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Music Copyright Fair Use 52