Remove what-is-likelihood-of-confusion
article thumbnail

Inferring Secondary Meaning from Product Design Copying

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch In patent law, product copying can serve as indirect evidence of non-obviousness. A pending petition before the Supreme Court asks a similar question in the trademark realm – to what extent does copying of a product serve as evidence of secondary meaning of the product associated trade dress.

Copying 57
article thumbnail

Logos Remain Relevant: Source Confusion and Design Patent Infringement

Patently-O

As the court made clear, while logos are often key for avoiding consumer confusion about product source in the trademark sense, the absence of source confusion does not necessarily preclude a finding of design patent infringement. For trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, likelihood of consumer confusion is a key requirement.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Colibri

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Though the court says it’s a close question, the court says that the plaintiff does not have a likelihood of success on the merits. To analyze this, the court applies the standard likelihood of consumer confusion factors. “any use of “Nursing Ce Central” creates at least some likelihood of confusion.

article thumbnail

Too Rusty For Krusty–Nickelodeon v. Rusty Krab Restaurant (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The Southern District of Texas granted Viacom’s motion for preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of both claims. The Southern District of Texas granted Viacom’s motion for preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of both claims.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

He then worked to boost the posts’ visibility, including: the posts asked users to “follow [his] link and mark it as helpful so that the message is amplified and as many people are warned as possible.”. ” he purchased keyword ads triggered by “LoanStreet” that displayed excerpts of his posts and linked to them. .”

article thumbnail

CAFC Denies Rehearing, Slightly Modifies Brooklyn Brewery Opinion; Professor McCarthy Not Impressed

The TTABlog

CAFC opinion here ; denial of rehearing here ], in which the court held that the Brewery lacked Article III standing to challenge the Board's ruling on likelihood of confusion involving non-competing goods. It leaves unsaid what is the “issue” when the parties are not in competition.

article thumbnail

Does Anyone Here Have A Sense Of Humor, Redux: Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Oral Argument

LexBlog IP

Whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis, or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark infringement claims. She continued: “Parodies can be confusing. If so, you should not have a dog.