The IPKat

AUGUST 25, 2023

English language text from journal articles; social media posts in X language; etc.) Conclusion While the number of survey responses is too small to make conclusive statements, it was interesting to see the prevalent data sources and how copyright protection may apply to some of those data (e.g., journal articles, databases).

Social Media 52

Social Media Law Journalism Copyright 52

IPilogue

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

The group highlighted their concerns regarding the regulation of text and data mining (TDM) activity under the Copyright Act. Moreover, TDM plays a role in scholarly and commercial research, education, and journalism. Included in these barriers was the uncertain applicability of section 3(1) of the Copyright Act.

Government 111

Government Copyright IP Intellectual Property 111

IPilogue

JANUARY 14, 2022

Pina D’Agostino is the Founder and Director of IP Osgoode, the IP Intensive Program, and the IP Innovation Clinic, the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of the IPilogue, the Deputy Editor of the Intellectual Property Journal, and an Associate Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. Is GitHub’s New Feature a Copyright Infringer?

IP 106

IP Copyright Infringement Inventor Intellectual Property 106

Kluwer Copyright Blog

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023

We set out to assess these arguments in light of data on the CCB’s first year of operation, which is explored in more detail in our article here , forthcoming in the Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, and the data used for this article available here. In some cases, however, there was no way to fix the complaint.

Copyright 78

Copyright Litigation Copying Journalism 78

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 27, 2023

Another troubling ruling for an Internet access provider trying to shake a contributory copyright claim based on user-caused copyright infringement. 11, 2023): Time and again we have declared that “prevailing defendants in copyright cases are presumptively entitled (and strongly so) to recover attorney fees.” Johnson, No.

IP 73

IP Advertising Advertising Copyright 73

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Based solely on the complaint that was filed, there are six major issues raised by the case: First, were the recorded interviews a copyright-eligible “work of authorship”? Second, if so, who is the initial owner of the copyright(s)? Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. 1332 ].

Copyright 120

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 120

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

In the context of certain questions that arose in the proceedings, Tanvi then brings up an interesting hypothetical i.e. what if the defendants had challenged the ownership of the copyright early on, instead of the attempt to amend it later on? Case: Shubham Munjwani vs State Of U.P.

Registration 105

Registration Designs Design Trademark 105

43(B)log

JUNE 26, 2023

A&E owns a trademark (for entertainment services) and registered copyrights for Live PD, “which for four years featured live feeds of law enforcement activity across America, along with live narration and commentary from host Dan Abrams and others.” Is that a good measure of confusion? Confusion about what, exactly?)

Social Media 59

Social Media Copying Fair Use Advertising 59

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

Patent and Trademark Office granted ownership of the word “Jesus” to Jesus Jeans, owned by a publicly traded Italian company, BasicNet, giving the company exclusive rights in America to sell clothing bearing the name “Jesus.” ” (at page 9 and 13). .” World Intellect. 75, 79 (2020). patentability standards.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

” So, to recap, UMG might try to sue Janet for copyright infringement for making intermediate copies of Drake sound recordings to train her model, but it probably wouldn’t have a viable copyright claim against either Chrissy or Jack, assuming they just used Janet’s model and didn’t contribute or assist her in creating it.

Music 85

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 85