SpicyIP

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Pocket FM claims to have an exclusive license from Manjul Publishing House, the publisher of translated titles, that holds the Hindi rights to these books. We are not aware of the exact terms of this contract and the specific rights licensed to Pocket FM. The term ‘abridgement’ is not separately defined.

Copyright 126

Copyright Copyright Infringement Licensing Fair Use 126

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. ” Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 13, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. Case number: No. 19-2420-cv. by Tito Rendas. €

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 12, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. Case number: No. 19-2420-cv. by Tito Rendas. €

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

TorrentFreak

APRIL 27, 2024

Speaking with TorrentFreak, Kuik recalls that the home video market was just opening up. Initially, movie studios saw videotapes as a threat, but they soon realized that they could market official movies to consumers as well, which proved to be a new source of revenue. The downside was that pirates would create bootleg copies.

Copyright Infringement 99

Copyright Infringement Copying Content Creation Marketing 99

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. Although this landmark copyright decision is hot off the presses, the facts date back to 1981 when the underlying photograph was first shot. § 107 ).

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Derivative Work Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

6] The Supreme Court’s ruling on that petition—and a possible eventual decision on the merits—could have enormous implications for the art world and other industries impacted by copyright law. That factor asks “whether, if the challenged use becomes widespread, it will adversely affect the potential market for the copyrighted work.”

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

Kluwer Copyright Blog

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

AI-generated art was used for magazine covers, including Cosmopolitan and The Economist. There will be debates over whether generative AI is, for the purposes of copyright, a tool used by a human author or is an autonomous creator of works (see previously on this blog e.g. here , here , here and here ).

Copyright 145

Copyright Art Fair Use Registration 145

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 19, 2022

For instance, even though you are permitted to use someone’s image for printed goods like magazines, posters, or brochures, its copyright or Terms of Use may forbid its use online. Before using someone else’s creation, consider how your actions will affect its market worth.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Copyright Public Domain Copying 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. Condé Nast paid $400 for the license, which specified “No other usage right granted.”

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 97

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

Goldsmith et al sheds light on different perspectives of copyright law in common law and civil law countries. This brief post dives into this duality, as exampled by American and Brazilian law. Firstly, both Brazilian and American legislation stipulate that the creator of a work holds copyright over it.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 16, 2023

Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts 1) Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act by João Pedro Quintais “ Generative AI is one of the hot topics in copyright law today. Read further posts on the Kluwer Copyright Blog here , the Kluwer Trademark Blog here and the Kluwer Patent blog here. It will focus on the s.10(3)

Blogging 52

Blogging Law IP Fair Use 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 9, 2022

The purpose of Article 16 DSM Directive is to ensure the publisher receives a share in any financial compensation for uses of the work which are allowed under the exceptions and limitations provided by EU copyright law. However, other marketers of works that do not meet the classic definition of publisher may also be considered.

Publishing 97

Publishing Music Copyright Law Marketing 97

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Fifth, assuming Trump owns a valid copyright, did he grant an implied license to Woodward to publish transcripts of the interviews and/or the record­ings themselves? Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment?

Copyright 122

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 122

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. In the 1981 case of Falwell v.

Copyright 98

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 98

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview.

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 52