The IP Law Blog

MAY 25, 2023

In a closely watched copyright case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Andy Warhol’s portraits of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. She asserted that the dissent failed to address the specific use alleged to infringe the copyright.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Derivative Work Artwork Copyright Law 98

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Goldsmith was whether or not Warhol’s use of Goldsmith’s photograph as a reference and departure point for the creation of an image of Prince constituted fair use or copyright infringement under U.S. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S. copyright law.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Law Art 52

Olartemoure Blog

JANUARY 18, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair licensed one of her black-and-white studio portraits for $400 and commissioned Warhol to create a piece for a feature of Prince. There was no image copyright credit or compensation to Lynn Goldsmith. The photographer threatened to sue the Foundation alleging copyright infringement.

Copyright 98

Copyright Artwork Copyright Infringement Fair Use 98

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

Warhol created these silkscreens from a photograph of Prince taken by Lynn Goldsmith, who claimed copyright infringement when the Warhol estate licensed Orange Prince to Conde Nast after Prince’s passing in 2016 to illustrate an article about Prince’s life and music. ” (S. ” See 143 S. ’” Id.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 52

IP Tech Blog

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Unbeknownst to Ms. Goldsmith, Andy Warhol not only used Ms.

Fair Use 57

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 57

Velocity of Content

AUGUST 9, 2022

Vanity Fair (magazine) took a license to use and modify the image for its magazine and hired Warhol to use his artistic talents to develop a new image. Goldsmith realized what had happened—that Warhol had made over a dozen works based on her photograph, the majority of which had not been licensed. federal copyright law)?

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Licensing Derivative Work Art 98

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

Warhol created these silkscreens from a photograph of Prince taken by Lynn Goldsmith, who claimed copyright infringement when the Warhol estate licensed Orange Prince to Conde Nast after Prince’s passing in 2016 to illustrate an article about Prince’s life and music. We limit our analysis accordingly.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 40

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Pocket FM claims to have an exclusive license from Manjul Publishing House, the publisher of translated titles, that holds the Hindi rights to these books. We are not aware of the exact terms of this contract and the specific rights licensed to Pocket FM. The term ‘abridgement’ is not separately defined.

Copyright 126

Copyright Copyright Infringement Fair Use Licensing 126

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

On March 26, 2021, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York found that the famed artist Andy Warhol violated photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s copyright by using her photo of the singer Prince to create his “Prince Series.” The series was originally commissioned by Vanity Fair after it bought the license of the photo portrait from Goldsmith.

Copyright Infringement 105

Copyright Infringement Copyright Art Fair Use 105

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. ” Unbeknownst to Ms.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 25, 2023

In a closely watched copyright case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Andy Warhol’s portraits of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. She asserted that the dissent failed to address the specific use alleged to infringe the copyright.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Artwork Copyright Law 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 13, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. Case number: No. 19-2420-cv. by Tito Rendas. €

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 12, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. Case number: No. 19-2420-cv. by Tito Rendas. €

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

IPilogue

DECEMBER 13, 2022

Emily Xiang is an IPilogue Writer, a Senior Fellow with the IP Innovation Clinic, and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. In 1984, Vanity Fair magazine received a licence from photographer Lynn Goldsmith to use her 1981 portrait of Prince, which she had shot on assignment for Newsweek.

Art 79

Art Fair Use Intellectual Property Licensing 79

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. Although this landmark copyright decision is hot off the presses, the facts date back to 1981 when the underlying photograph was first shot.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Derivative Work Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 11, 2024

You see, when I was growing up, computers took up entire rooms and content was published on paper – books, newspapers, magazines, and yes, sometimes even broadcast on television or radio. Much of that content is protected by copyright laws. The Perks of Using Copyrighted Content: Should We Feed the Machine?

Copyright 52

Copyright Due Diligence Content Creation Copyright Law 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

AI-generated art was used for magazine covers, including Cosmopolitan and The Economist. We will keep the law under review and could amend, replace or remove protection in future if the evidence supports it.” Registration was refused in August 2019, in line with previous US case law and guidance.

Copyright 145

Copyright Art Fair Use Registration 145

TorrentFreak

APRIL 27, 2024

In a recent interview with a Dutch film magazine , Kuik mentioned that BREIN received hydrochloric acid in the mail at some point, adding that police complaints were filed on various occasions. The greatest defeat came in a Usenet-related lawsuit, where the court ultimately ruled that the provider was not violating copyright law.

Copyright Infringement 100

Copyright Infringement Copying Content Creation Marketing 100

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

6] The Supreme Court’s ruling on that petition—and a possible eventual decision on the merits—could have enormous implications for the art world and other industries impacted by copyright law. Now the Warhol Foundation has petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of the Second Circuit’s amended decision. [6]

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 19, 2022

For instance, even though you are permitted to use someone’s image for printed goods like magazines, posters, or brochures, its copyright or Terms of Use may forbid its use online. Look for those that have Creative Commons licensing so they can be used commercially. Public domain resources as a starting point.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Copyright Public Domain Copying 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

Goldsmith et al sheds light on different perspectives of copyright law in common law and civil law countries. This brief post dives into this duality, as exampled by American and Brazilian law. Firstly, both Brazilian and American legislation stipulate that the creator of a work holds copyright over it.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

Nelligan Law

MARCH 25, 2024

So, when Prince’s untimely exit prompted a resurrection of the original article alongside a commemorative Conde Nast magazine featuring the full Prince Series, Goldsmith saw red—and not just any red, but a vibrant, copyright-infringement red. Last summer, in the case of ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC.

Copyright Infringement 82

Copyright Infringement Fair Use Art Settlement 82

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. Condé Nast paid $400 for the license, which specified “No other usage right granted.”

Fair Use 96

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 96

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

His work has been commissioned in magazines and newspapers such as the New York Post , Daily Mail Online , Reader’s Digest , USA Today , New York Times , Fox News , CBS News , NBC News , Boston Globe , Boston Herald , Los Angeles Times , Newsweek Magazine , and People Magazine.

Copyright Infringement 97

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Licensing 97

Kluwer Copyright Blog

JULY 16, 2023

Top 3 Kluwer Copyright Blog posts 1) Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act by João Pedro Quintais “ Generative AI is one of the hot topics in copyright law today. Read further posts on the Kluwer Copyright Blog here , the Kluwer Trademark Blog here and the Kluwer Patent blog here. It will focus on the s.10(3)

Blogging 52

Blogging Law IP Fair Use 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 9, 2022

The purpose of Article 16 DSM Directive is to ensure the publisher receives a share in any financial compensation for uses of the work which are allowed under the exceptions and limitations provided by EU copyright law. For certain uses caught by exceptions and limitations, the author receives financial compensation.

Publishing 97

Publishing Music Copyright Law Marketing 97

Copyright Lately

MAY 21, 2021

In 2019, Dolezal, then represented by notorious copyright troll Richard Liebowitz, filed a lawsuit against the publisher of Paper Magazine for using a photo from her Instagram account in a story. Sometimes, copyright law is even weaponized by those who don’t own copyrights.

Copyright 98

Copyright Copyright Infringement Fair Use Copyright Law 98

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Fifth, assuming Trump owns a valid copyright, did he grant an implied license to Woodward to publish transcripts of the interviews and/or the record­ings themselves? Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment?

Copyright 121

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 121

The IP Law Blog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. In the 1981 case of Falwell v.

Copyright 98

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 98

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

According to the Copyright compendium, the authors of a joint work jointly owns the copyright in each other’s contribution. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview. There is precedent that an interviewee does not hold any copyright in an interview.

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Infringement Publishing Derivative Work 52