Remove patent-final-office-action-vs-non-final-office-action
article thumbnail

ChatUSG: What Companies Doing Business with the Government Need to Know About Artificial Intelligence

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Further, the joint statement reiterates that these agencies “take seriously our responsibility to ensure that these rapidly evolving automated systems are developed and used in a manner consistent with federal laws, and each of our agencies has previously expressed concern about potentially harmful uses of automated systems.” AI RMF 1.0

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and creativity in visual art: what are the protectability requirements? Part 2: the US Thaler vs Perlmutter case

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Introduction Part 1 analysed an Italian case related to the copyright protection of a “floral fractal” generated via machine-learning (see RAI vs Biancheri ). The US Copyright Office denied the application on the grounds that the work lacked human authorship. The District Court confirmed the decision of the US Copyright Office.

Art 65
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 4-March 10)

SpicyIP

Highlights of the Week Hot-Tubbing in Indian IP Litigation: Delhi High Court Issues Directives in High-Stakes Patent Infringement Case Image from [link] here Recently, the DHC issued directives regarding expert evidence in the Perjeta patent litigation. The Patent Act: Catch 22 Does the Patent Act prevail over the Competition Act?

article thumbnail

Rulemaking at the US Patent Office: Does Director Guidance On Discretionary Denials of Review Require Opportunity for Public Comment?

IP Tech Blog

The Federal Circuit has refused to uphold the dismissal of a complaint alleging that the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) improperly issued instructions to PTAB judges regarding whether to institute requested patent review proceedings. were designated as precedential in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

Patent 57
article thumbnail

Rulemaking at the US Patent Office: Does Director Guidance On Discretionary Denials of Review Require Opportunity for Public Comment?

LexBlog IP

The Federal Circuit has refused to uphold the dismissal of a complaint alleging that the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) improperly issued instructions to PTAB judges regarding whether to institute requested patent review proceedings. were designated as precedential in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 29- December 5)

SpicyIP

As an additional update, Delhi High Court has put out a call for Law Researchers (IPD) on a contractual basis for 1 year, which can further be extended to 3 years. Discussing the Recent Patent Application Restorations by Delhi and Madras High Courts. Call for Submissions- The IP Press Law Review: Volume I Issue 2 [Submit by Jan 2].

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 6- February 12)

SpicyIP

Highlights of the Week The Copyright Quandary regarding the Delhi High Court Rules on Live-streaming of Court Proceedings Recently Delhi High Court came up with ‘Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings Rules’ which would be a positive step towards assuring better access to law and transparency. on Triveni Interchem Pvt.

Designs 52