article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Ruling Reinforces Importance of Documenting Inventions Pre-Collaboration

JD Supra Law

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed an appeal of a decision granting summary judgment that an invention was reduced to practice during the term of a cooperative research and development agreement thereby granting the government a license to use the invention. By: Morgan Lewis

Invention 100
article thumbnail

AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI?

Intellectual Property Law Blog

patent application has a duty to disclose to the USPTO all information which is materially relevant in assessing the patentability of the invention. With the advent of such AI-assisted inventions, the USPTO is rethinking its requirements regarding the duty of disclosure. Everyone involved in the filing and prosecution of a U.S.

Invention 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Addressing the Challenges of Documentation

IP.com

In order for an inventor to file for patent protection, their invention must be carefully documented. The post Addressing the Challenges of Documentation appeared first on IP.com - IP Innovation and Analytics. This is true whether the inventor is working alone or is part of a.

article thumbnail

How to Write an Invention Disclosure

IP.com

Invention disclosure documents are the important first steps in the IP commercialization process. Not only does it represent the first recording of the invention, establishing the date and scope, but they have been used to defeat challenges to dates of invention, inventorship, invention scope, and prior art.

article thumbnail

New USPTO Guidelines on AI-Assisted Inventions Leave Many Questions Unanswered

JD Supra Law

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued what it labeled as Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions [Docket No. Despite its name, the document provides little in the way of certainty that one could not garner from reviewing recent precedent addressing the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) inventions.

article thumbnail

Guidance on Patenting Inventions with AI Contributions

Patently-O

As artificial intelligence progresses at an unprecedented pace, numerous cases have emerged where generative AI has played a crucial role in conceiving an invention. This raises the question of whether it is appropriate to designate the human, who contributed to only a part of the invention and collaborated with the AI, as the sole inventor.

Invention 126
article thumbnail

G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)

The IPKat

The recent decision in T 0258/21 , by contrast, is the first interpretation of G 2/21 leading to a finding of a lack of inventive step in view of an inadequate disclosure of the purported technical effect. However, T 0258/21 related to subject matter for which the EPO has always required additional evidence.

Invention 117