SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

Singh’s book on Patent Law is finally out. Also present were foreign dignitaries, including Annabelle Bennett (Former Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Sydney), Colin Birss (Lord Justice, Court of Appeal, England and Wales), and Klaus Grabinski (President of the Unified Patent Court (EU), Luxembourg).

Patent Law 59

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 59

The IPKat

DECEMBER 11, 2023

Injunctions are all the rage in contemporary patent law. This week marks the publication of a book by the IPKat’s Dutch friend and former GuestKat Léon Dijkman on the hotly contested notion of the proportionality test in European patent law, accessible for free here. Oh, how times have changed.

Patent Law 70

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 70

The IP Law Blog

MARCH 15, 2024

Can AI inventions be patented? Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri explore recent USPTO guidance on patenting AI-assisted inventions in this episode of The Briefing. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel or listen to this podcast episode here.

Invention 62

Invention Patent Patent Law Law 62

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021

When the America Invents Act (AIA) was before Congress a decade ago, it was heralded as the first comprehensive patent law since the 1952 Act. Ten years’ perspective on the new law, however, shows that its changes to patent policy have been more evolution rather than revolution.

Invention 125

Invention Patent Patent Law Law 125

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. Stephen L.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Intepat

APRIL 19, 2023

INTRODUCTION As technology continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, Computer-Related Inventions (CRIs) have become a crucial component of modern innovation. The Patents Act, 1970, provides for the protection of CRIs, but there has been significant debate over the years regarding the patentability of such inventions in India.

Invention 52

Invention Intellectual Property Patent Copyright 52

IP Watchdog

JULY 15, 2022

Clearing the air on labyrinthine subject-matter eligibility standards for computer-implemented inventions (CIIs), a Canadian Federal Court last month revisited the issue in Benjamin Moore & Co. Attorney General of Canada, 2022 FC 923.

Invention 65

Invention Intellectual Property Patent Application Patent Law 65

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 31, 2023

PatentNext Summary: Software and computer-implemented inventions (CII) have experienced explosive growth in recent years. This article looks at laws of jurisdictions in Southeast Asia, comparing the status of enforcement and protection of software and CII in various Southeast Asia countries. or by telephone at +65 6956 9943.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Intellectual Property IP 52

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. AT&T (No.

Patent Law 73

Patent Law Law Patent Art 73

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 5, 2021

Commissioner of Patents , case number VID 108 of 2021, in the Federal Court of Australia, an Australian Federal Judge became the first known jurist to rule that inventions developed by artificial intelligence can qualify for patent protection. In Thaler v. And, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.

Invention 98

Invention Inventor Patent Moral Rights 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 5, 2023

Navigating Korean Patent Law Changes: Accelerated Examination, PTEs, and Court Decisions @media screen and (max-width: 1023px) {.thegem-vc-text.thegem-custom-642e0f5b9c76d4054{display: Additionally, changes to the criminal law provisions prosecute both design and utility patent infringement.

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Intellectual Property Patent 52

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.

Invention 122

Invention Inventor IP Ownership 122

Patently-O

AUGUST 4, 2021

Ryan Abbott, have made headlines around the world as they sought patent protection for a fractal-inspired beverage container (shown below) that they contend was invented by DABUS. Does substantive South African patent law preclude AI inventorship? Was granting the patent a mistake? Stephen Thaler and Prof.

Invention 127

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 127

IP Blog

JANUARY 20, 2021

The Everyday IP blog series was triggered by a brainstorming session in which we realized how many people — including us, sometimes! — Socks, of all things, factor into the early patent laws of the U.K., Socks, of all things, factor into the early patent laws of the U.K., Europe and the U.S., Europe and the U.S.,

Invention 52

Invention IP Intellectual Property Blogging 52

IP Watchdog

JULY 14, 2022

The idea of patented inventions brings to mind machines fully realized - flying contraptions and engines with gears and pistons operating in coherent symphony. The AI inventor’s ways are antithetical to the principles of patent writing, where inventions are described in terms of what does what, why, how, and how often.

Patent Law 137

Patent Law Patent Inventor Invention 137

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

Kat friend Iana Kazeeva provides an enlightening discussion on steps taken by the Russian government and courts with respect to IP following the invasion of Ukraine. The common denominator is the use of changes to the IP law as a political instrument towards states taking “unfriendly” actions against Russia.

IP 132

IP Branding Brands Branding 132

IPilogue

JUNE 2, 2022

Thaler’s application for his AI, DABUS, to be the patent owner of an invention titled “ Food container and devices and methods for attracting enhanced attention ,” a product solely created by DABUS without any human interference. What Does This Mean in the Canadian Context? In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,

Invention 111

Invention Ownership Intellectual Property Inventor 111

LexBlog IP

JULY 31, 2023

AI and IP Law: Podcast with Yuri Eliezer by Yuri L. Eliezer AI and Intellectual Property Law An Insightful Discussion with Yuri Eliezer The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intellectual Property (IP) Law is becoming increasingly significant in the dynamic landscape of technology and innovation.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

IP Law 360

JANUARY 3, 2023

patent law subject matter eligibility is based on antiquated notions of invention, but basing eligibility on measures that evolve with technology and innovation would allow us to foster innovation, not stifle it, says Aldo Martinez at Oblon.

Patent Law 40

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 40

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

In about 150 pages the Report suggests a major reevaluation of the IP framework in the country. Section 3 of the Patents Act creates a list of restrictions on what inventions are not patentable. The Report suggests loosening some of the restrictions on what a patentable subject matter is.

Reporting 140

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 140

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

In United States patent law, in addition to satisfying the requirements for subject-matter eligibility, novelty, enablement, definiteness, and nonobviousness, a patent must comply with the written description requirement as specified in 35 U.S.C. Written description is an issue of fact, which is resolved on a case-by-case basis.

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Invention Patent 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 13, 2024

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”).

Reporting 52

Reporting Non-Fungible Tokens IP Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 12, 2023

This trend brings about new risks to intellectual property (IP), including new challenges in procuring IP protection and new risks of IP infringement. Part I of this two-part post will focus on IP procurement. Patenting an invention requires pinning down the correct inventorship. Yet, the U.S.

IP 40

IP Invention Intellectual Property Inventor 40

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 30, 2022

The diminished bench split 3:3, with Kiefel CJ, Gageler and Keane JJ finding Aristocrat’s claims unpatentable, while Gordon, Edelman and Steward JJ would have allowed the appeal, concluding that the claimed invention was patent-eligible. We were hoping for some clarity on the patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions.

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 52

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

In the fast growing economy, innovation is necessary for businesses and Patents as an intellectual property rights protects that innovation. Intellectual property rights provide a negative right in other words a monopoly right to the creator or Inventor over their creation or Invention. 1] WIPO, Competition and Patents. [2]

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2023

In United States patent law, in addition to satisfying the requirements for subject-matter eligibility, novelty, enablement, nonobviousness, and written description, a patent must comply with the definiteness requirement as specified in 35 U.S.C. §112(b). [1] §112(b). [1] ” [3].

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 52

The IP Law Blog

JANUARY 18, 2024

Companies rely on intellectual property (“IP”) rights to protect their valuable information, creations, and branding. IP rights come in several forms: copyrights, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) states, ” a trademark protects brand names and logos used on goods and services.

Confidentiality 113

Confidentiality Invention Business Artistic Work 113

IAM Magazine

OCTOBER 26, 2022

IP Counsel at startup support organisation Engine and Executive Director of the Public Interest Patent Law Institute discuss the benefits of the controversial legislation

Invention 52

Invention Patent Law IP Law 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. Stephen L.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 8, 2022

Patent Case. Relevant to patent law, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide the issue of enablement for patents with so-called “genus claims.” ” Genus claims are directed to inventions that are functional in nature, and with several possibilities for carrying out that function.

IP 52

IP Invention Intellectual Property Trademark 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 24, 2022

The invention in Yu was a multi-lens camera deemed abstract by the Federal Circuit. The Kessler Doctrine : If you want to really dig into this case, please read my article on the topic that I wrote for an Akron Law review IP symposium issue. Basically, the patentee failed to disclose pre-filing sales of the invention.

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Litigation 95

IIPRD

JANUARY 24, 2023

Software being a Grey area can be provided protection under two heads, while trade secrets plays a major role in protection of innovation including patent. A robust and substantive IP portfolio does not only protect inventions but, also demonstrates the strength of the innovative business models of companies.

IP 52

IP Invention Intellectual Property Due Diligence 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 28, 2023

However, in a recent case, the Federal Circuit found that a “machine learning” claim element lacked sufficient enablement because both the claim itself and the written description of the patent to which it belonged failed to describe “ how ” the claimed invention implemented this element. § 112(a)).

Invention 52

Invention Patent Application Art Patent 52

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022

The Supreme Court’s 2021 decision retained assignor estoppel as a cognizable patent law doctrine that can bar a former patent owner from later challenging the patent’s validity. ” The patent document is clearly directed toward the permeable portion as a key aspect of the invention.

Invention 60

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 60

IP Watchdog

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today released guidance for determining inventorship of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted inventions.

Invention 65

Invention Patent Law Patent Trademark 65

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

A significant portion of the suggested reforms to the Patents Act is dedicated to recommendations on loosening the procedural norms of patent filing and patent examination. Issues of executive interference , vacancies , and mismatched expertise of adjudicating members had long plagued the IPAB, a specialized IP forum.

Reporting 136

Reporting Patent Law Patent Application Patent 136