Remove trademark-cancellation
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 4- September 10)

SpicyIP

Tejaswini writes on this order by the Division Bench and its subsequent acknowledgment by the court, highlighting how this order can correct the practice of granting unfair ex parte ad-interim interim injunctions in Trademark litigation disputes. Preliminary Exams for the Recruitment of Patent and Designs Examiners Cancelled!

article thumbnail

New Vision Gaming Cites GAO Report to Bolster PTAB Bias Arguments

IP Watchdog

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) denied its request for Director Review. The case relates to a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision canceling all claims of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) leadership gives new weight to New Vision's arguments, says the brief. (New Vision) filed a brief with the U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 4-March 10)

SpicyIP

Highlights of the Week Hot-Tubbing in Indian IP Litigation: Delhi High Court Issues Directives in High-Stakes Patent Infringement Case Image from [link] here Recently, the DHC issued directives regarding expert evidence in the Perjeta patent litigation. Please let us know in the comments below. Read on to know more!

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 19- February 25)

SpicyIP

Last week we published 3 posts on the MHC’s interpretation of Section 3(d) in the Novozymes case, DHC’s referral of 3 questions concerning the jurisdiction of High Courts in trademark rectification matters, and DHC’s decision on infringement of product by process claims. Anything we are missing out on? Legislative Oversight?

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 18- September 24)

SpicyIP

On one hand, they can lead to an amicable settlement between the parties and prevent lengthy litigations. The defendant asserted that the invention lacked novel hardware and was primarily software-based, making it ineligible for patent protection. Image from here Kia Wang vs The Registrar of Trademarks & Anr. Emami Ltd.

article thumbnail

District Court Dismisses Challenge to PTAB’s Discretion to Deny Inter Parties Review

The IP Law Blog

Under the America Invents Act (AIA), 35 U.S.C. § Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) to review and potentially cancel claims in an already-issued patent that the PTO finds to be unpatentable in light of prior art. An IPR functions similar to a civil litigation once instituted. 100 et seq. , a party may ask the U.S.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The decisions in the first category, i.e., Top 10 IP Cases/Judgements (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.

IP 124