article thumbnail

No Presents for Gift Card Patent Owner from Federal Circuit

IP Watchdog

lost its patent infringement cases against Simon Property Group/Blackhawk Network and Cigna Corporation in two separate decisions issued by the U.S. AlexSam, Inc. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Monday, April 1. AlexSam owns U.S. 6,000,608, which discloses a “multifunction card system.”

Patent 57
article thumbnail

De Forest Radio v. GE: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision on the Invention Requirement

Patently-O

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. The case involved a patent infringement suit over an improved vacuum tube used in radio communications. Background The patent at issue, U.S. General Electric Co. , 571 (1931).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Pharmaceutical Companies Have Rights if the Federal Government Seized their Patents

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Drug companies who may be at risk of having their patents seized should be aware that they have the right to sue the government for patent infringement in such an event. 1498, the government has the right to “take” privately held patents. the current, established royalty rates under the patent at issue; 2.

article thumbnail

Hot-Tubbing in Indian IP Litigation: Delhi High Court Issues Directives in High-Stakes Patent Infringement Case

SpicyIP

This high-profile case revolves around allegations of patent infringement concerning two patents (“Suit Patents”), both relating to ‘Pertuzumab,’ a monoclonal antibody (Mab) biologic used in inhibiting tumor growth. For example in Australian law, Rule 23.15

article thumbnail

“Shall Be the Property” Is Insufficient to Automatically Assign Title to an Invention in a Contract

JD Supra Law

s (“Apple”) motion to dismiss Omni MedSci’s (“Omni”) patent infringement complaint for lack of standing. At the center of the Majority’s holding was its decision that the contractual language “shall be the property of the University” did not create a present automatic assignment of title to. By: Haug Partners LLP

article thumbnail

Assignor Estoppel: What did the assignor “represent” as his invention?

Patently-O

” The patent document is clearly directed toward the permeable portion as a key aspect of the invention. But, one claim in the original application (Claim 31) was directed to other aspects of the invention and did not expressly require use of the permeable member. Later Novacept was purchased for $300m by Hologic.

article thumbnail

Delhi High Court Directs Maharaja to Pay a King’s Ransom in a Patent Infringement Suit  

SpicyIP

Putting an end to a 24 year old patent infringement suit, the Delhi High Court has directed Maharaja Appliances Ltd. As a further twist, the defendants stated that they changed suppliers after facing some quality issues and switched to an unnamed Chinese supplier, who the defendant claimed had their own patent on the imported vessel.