Patently-O

MAY 19, 2024

The article also examines how the characterization of intellectual property rights as “monopolies” has shaped legal doctrine, such as the Supreme Court’s reliance on the “public rights doctrine” to uphold adjudication of patent validity in administrative proceedings. Oil States Energy Servs., LLC, 138 S.

Patent Law 45

Patent Law Law Intellectual Property Patent 45

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

The IPKat

DECEMBER 11, 2023

Injunctions are all the rage in contemporary patent law. This week marks the publication of a book by the IPKat’s Dutch friend and former GuestKat Léon Dijkman on the hotly contested notion of the proportionality test in European patent law, accessible for free here. Oh, how times have changed.

Patent Law 70

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 70

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

Singh’s book on Patent Law is finally out. Also present were foreign dignitaries, including Annabelle Bennett (Former Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Sydney), Colin Birss (Lord Justice, Court of Appeal, England and Wales), and Klaus Grabinski (President of the Unified Patent Court (EU), Luxembourg).

Patent Law 59

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 59

Patently-O

AUGUST 5, 2022

Patent Law, because the U.S. Patent Act was amended in 2011 to expressly require that inventors be “individuals.” In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. The word individual is important for U.S. 35 U.S.C. §

Invention 99

Invention Inventor Patent Law Patent 99

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. Bottom line, no patent cases were decided by the Court in the 2021-2022 term and none were granted certiorari for the new term starting this week. Of the 17 pending patent-focused petitions, 13 are set to be decided at the long conference.

Patent Law 125

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 125

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. The case involved a patent infringement suit over an improved vacuum tube used in radio communications. Background The patent at issue, U.S. General Electric Co. , 571 (1931).

Invention 63

Invention Art Patent Television 63

Patently-O

JANUARY 19, 2024

ITC , the Federal Circuit has affirmed determinations by the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) favoring the patent holder Universal Electronics, Inc. The most interesting part of the case for me is the assignment issue – whether the patents had been properly assigned at the appropriate time. Universal”).

Inventor 68

Inventor Ownership Contracts Intellectual Property 68

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine.

Patent Law 74

Patent Law Law Patent Art 74

Larson & Larson

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

In this post, we will explore the intricacies of patent application restrictions, aiming to demystify the process and empower inventors with the knowledge they need to navigate this aspect of patent law successfully. One of the key themes that arises from the restriction requirement is the concept of unity of invention.

Patent Application 40

Patent Application Invention Patent Inventor 40

Patently-O

AUGUST 4, 2021

A world first – South Africa recently made headlines by granting a patent for ‘a food container based on fractal geometry’ to a non-human inventor, namely an artificial intelligence (AI) machine called DABUS. Each of these three jurisdictions found sufficient reasons in these formalities to reject DABUS’ patent applications.

Invention 128

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 128

Patently-O

APRIL 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office announced the winner of this year’s National Patent Application Drafting Competition (NPADC), the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. I would encourage any law student interested in pursuing a career in patent prosecution to consider participating in the competition next year.

Patent Application 96

Patent Application Law Patent Prosecution Patent 96

The IPKat

MAY 19, 2024

The USPTO has issued a request for comments regarding the impact of AI on patentability. The USPTO specifically calls for views on how the proliferation of AI could affect evaluations of patentability, including what qualifies as prior art and the capabilities of the person skilled in the art. Comments are due by 29 June 2024.

Patent 62

Patent Art Invention Patent Law 62

The IPKat

AUGUST 4, 2023

The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21 related to the evidence requirement for a purported technical effect relied on for inventive step. The Board of Appeal in T 2803/18 , in particular, highlights how G 2/21 may be relevant to inventions in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Invention 98

Invention Art Patent Reporting 98

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? Patent Appl. Thaler, assignee, filed U.S. 16/524,350 (“the ’350 Appl.”)

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

Patently-O

DECEMBER 22, 2022

Although somewhat slow thus far, there is some potential that 2023 will turn out to be a major year for Supreme Court patent law jurisprudence. to cumulatively identify and make all or nearly all embodiments of the invention without substantial “ ‘time and effort,’ ”. Sanofi , No. Amgen Petition. Kite Pharma, Inc. ,

Patent Law 59

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 59

SpicyIP

AUGUST 1, 2021

The Report focuses on reviewing the working of the Patents Act since its 2005 amendment that brought the Indian legislation in compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. A significant portion of the Report is dedicated to suggesting changes to the Patents Act, albeit without much justification on why these changes are needed.

Reporting 140

Reporting Patent Law Law Patent 140

The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Image: Thomson Reuters In ‘The Artificial Inventor’ ( Thomson Reuters ), Luz Sánchez García (University of Murcia) characterises humanity as standing at the cusp of an ‘Artificial Invention Age’ in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer used as a tool but rather a creative partner or independent innovator.

Inventor 140

Inventor Invention Patent Ownership 140

Patently-O

AUGUST 23, 2023

Patent Nos. Steuben sued Shibuya on three patents and initially won with a jury awarding $38 million in infringement damages. The doctrine is justified on the basis that language has inherent limitations in capturing the true scope of an invention, so equivalents help protect the inventor and promote innovation. 14, 2023) (U.S.

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Guidance on using AI to Invent Due to the quick rise of artificial intelligence (AI), most (if not all) of the laws relating to the US patent system were not written with AI in mind. Vidal , a Federal Court of Appeals case that determined whether AI can be listed as an inventor on a patent application.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Application 52

Patently-O

MAY 22, 2024

by Dennis Crouch In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s grant of summary judgment that an inventor, Dr. Mark Core, had automatically assigned a patent associated with his PhD thesis to his then-employer and education funder TRW. Dr. Core conceived of the invention while pursuing a Ph.D. 23-1001 (Fed.

Ownership 40

Ownership Patent Invention Contracts 40

IPilogue

DECEMBER 14, 2022

Serena Nath is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Controversy and uncertainty in the field of patent eligibility have resulted in decade-long fights over what can be patented and what cannot be, especially regarding diagnostic tests. History of Patenting Diagnostic Methods.

Patent 105

Patent Invention Inventor Patent Law 105

Patently-O

OCTOBER 16, 2023

by Dennis Crouch Impact of Sonos on Patent Prosecution : The recent Sonos v. Google decision threatens to grind to a halt, or at least significantly restrict, a once-common patent prosecution strategy – keeping continuation applications pending for years to obtain new claims that cover marketplace developments. Sonos Inc. 6, 2023).

Patent 126

Patent Patent Prosecution Invention Inventor 126

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

by Dennis Crouch One of the more shocking patent decisions of 2023 was Judge Alsup’s holding in Sonos, Inc. The scathing opinion left two Sonos multi-zone smart-speaker patents unenforceable due to prosecution laches and a rejection of the $32 million jury verdict. Google LLC , No. C 20-06754 WHA, 2023 WL 6542320 (N.D.

Patent 98

Patent Patent Prosecution Patent Law Marketing 98

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 9, 2021

In the past 50 years, the Supreme Court has decided about 70 patent cases (depending upon how you count). The case was set-up as a showdown on questions of patent eligibility in the “highly esoteric field of computer technology.” The Patent Office rejected the claims, but the CCPA revived them. Johnston , 425 U.S.

Invention 74

Invention Patent Art Technology 74

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

His research interests are broad, and he recently completed a comparative work examining patents in Islamic law. Companies and law firms with a transnational presence in Islamic countries should recognize that patents may present different considerations in countries with less secular legal systems. patent law.

Law 106

Law Patent Intellectual Property Patent Infringement 106

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 6, 2023

In the recent UK decision Astellas v Teva [2023] EWHC 2571 (Pat) Mr Justice Mellor in the High Court considered sufficiency, inventive step and infringement of Astellas' formulation patent for mirabegron. The decision also deviates from EPO practice on sufficiency and the inventive step of selection inventions.

Invention 67

Invention Patent Law Patent Law 67

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 10, 2024

Deputy Controller , Madras High court rejected the contention that the subject invention was excluded for being business method. The findings of this short judgement have possible significant implications on the jurisprudence regarding 3(k) and business methods in the Patent Act. 3(k) of the Patent Act and thereby excluded.

Business 88

Business Invention Privacy Patent Application 88

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? Patent Appl. Thaler, assignee, filed U.S. 16/524,350 (“the ’350 Appl.”)

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

SpicyIP

MAY 4, 2024

The Delhi High Court, on 24th April, passed an order that our patent law enthusiast readers will be very interested in! Pic from here Natco v Novartis 2024: Delhi High Court’s Novartis Moment & Indian Patent Law’s Déjà Vu By Shivam Kaushik A Division Bench (DB) of the Delhi High Court recently passed a judgment in Natco Pharma v.

Patent 105

Patent Invention Patent Law Law 105

Patently-O

APRIL 17, 2024

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions.

False Advertising 114

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Patent 114

IPilogue

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

For the first time in decades, the US Supreme Court will engage with enablement in patent applications. Specifically, Amgen seeks to appeal a decision from the Federal Circuit , in which the court found Amgen’s patents invalid for lack of enablement. The requirement of enablement in US patent law is codified in 35 USC s.

Patent 101

Patent Invention Art Inventor 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MARCH 13, 2024

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). Patent applicants and practitioners could benefit from guidance regarding obtaining patents in the context of NFTs.

Reporting 130

Reporting Non-Fungible Tokens IP Intellectual Property 130

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022

The Supreme Court’s 2021 decision retained assignor estoppel as a cognizable patent law doctrine that can bar a former patent owner from later challenging the patent’s validity. ” The patent document is clearly directed toward the permeable portion as a key aspect of the invention.

Invention 61

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 61

Patently-O

MAY 8, 2024

The petition presents three key questions for the Court’s consideration: Whether claims drawn to solving specific problems restricting the usefulness of an existing computer-network technology recite patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § Whether the challenged claims are patent eligible. 101 and Alice Corp.

Patent 45

Patent Invention Technology Patent Law 45

Garrigues Blog

JUNE 22, 2021

In accordance with the Spanish Patent Law, the first application for a patent made in Spain must be filed at the Spanish Patents and Trademarks Office and penalties can be imposed in the event of the breach of this requirement. What is an invention made in Spain? Compulsory application for protection in Spain.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Due Diligence 52

Patently-O

MAY 6, 2024

by Dennis Crouch This may be a useful case for patent prosecutors to cite to the USPTO because it creates a strong dividing line for the printed matter doctrine — applying the doctrine only to cases where the claims recite the communicative content of information. Kevin Emerson Collins, Patent Law’s Authorship Screen , 84 U.

Patent 63

Patent Invention Designs Design 63