Journalism Licensing Marketing Privacy 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 29, 2022
6th Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases and Materials (with Rebecca Tushnet). The Constitutionality of Mandating Editorial Transparency , 73 Hastings Law Journal 1203 (2022). Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Aug. Books and Academic Articles.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 24, 2024
The court explains that, despite the license, Gutman could use “her name for noncommercial purposes, including personal social-media accounts.” Johnson The Spectacular Failure of Employee Social Media Privacy Laws Do Employers Own LinkedIn Groups Created By Employees?–CDM Case citation : JLM Couture, Inc. Christou v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
JULY 11, 2021
After Natco’s Withdrawal, Bajaj Healthcare files for Compulsory License to Manufacture Baricitinib. I analysed Bajaj Healthcare’s application for compulsory license to manufacture Eli Lilly’s Baricitinib, an arthritis drug more recently used for Covid treatment. Other Posts. For further details, please see the announcement.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 28, 2022
The agreement also granted a license to JLM in Gutman’s name (“Hayley, Paige, Hayley Paige Gutman, Hayley Gutman, Hayley Page, or any derivative thereof”). Instead, this relief can be premised on JLM’s license to use Gutman’s name, and the fact that the account was a work-related account. Christou v.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 2, 2023
Publishing and Journalism Organisations, Global Principles on Artificial Intelligence In August 2023, various European publishing and journalism organisations united in releasing global principles on AI. The goal is to collect factual information and relant views toadvise Congress on national and international issues on the topic.
SpicyIP
JULY 19, 2021
Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personality rights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights. She criticises the judgment because the Court based its reasoning solely on privacy without any justifications rooted in property rights.
Michael Geist
APRIL 5, 2022
First, companies such as Facebook deserve much of the criticism that has come their way and there is a desperate need for stronger regulatory measures, most notably involving privacy, competition, taxation, and appropriate accountability for foreseeable harms that arise from the platforms. That is best described as a shakedown.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
89 
Let's personalize your content