article thumbnail

Is Generative AI Fair Use of Copyright Works? NYT v. OpenAI

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The lawsuits brought by the owners of such works, including artworks in the case of image-generators and journalism in the NYT case, claim that this should not be allowed. Instead, Google Books was found to support the marketing of books by giving them increased public exposure. Copyright Office in its 2017 report on moral rights.

Fair Use 137
article thumbnail

A Message from Deputy Secretary Don Graves

U.S. Department of Commerce

We firmly believe that diversity and inclusion are not just morally right but also strategically smart. 2] Likewise, a Journal of Management Studies article found a positive relationship between board racial diversity and both firm reputation and innovation. [3] 5] The implications of these findings are profound. 6] The U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (July 5-11)

SpicyIP

Moreover, with several royalty-free licenses provided by Eli Lilly to ramp up local manufacture, the availability of the drug in the market is likely to have risen and it is all the more difficult to argue that the patent has not been worked. The plaintiff also claimed violation of moral rights and infringement of posthumous celebrity rights.

article thumbnail

Anil Kapoor Vs Simply Life India & Ors: An Unwavering Assurance In Safeguarding Personality Rights Against Ai

IP and Legal Filings

” The court ruled that the cricket player’s image rights were not violated since individuals have the right to conduct their business under their own name, as long as they do not engage in any activities that might cause confusion with another person’s business, and as long as they do so in good faith.

article thumbnail

Copyright case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof 2015 – 2019 – Part 4 of 4: Copyright contract law and enforcement

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The question as to whether the required serious infringement of moral rights had occurred could, the BGH ruled, only be ascertained on the basis of an analysis of the entire circumstances of the specific case. The Goldrapper case concerned, once more, a claim for non-material damages as per Section 97(2), fourth sentence UrhG.

article thumbnail

Just Humor Them: Jests, Jokes, Satire, and Parody In Infringement and Defamation Cases

LexBlog IP

Why the CJEU decision in Deckmyn is broader than parody”(2015) 52(2) Common Market Review 511, 518 (2015)]. ” Although the CJEU never mentioned the phrase ‘moral rights’ in its ruling, paragraph 31 might be read as referring to them.”). Eleonora Rosati, “Just a laughing matter? See Scott J.