Remove is-software-patentable
article thumbnail

AI Developing Software Companies Litigate Over Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for Patent Infringement. DSI is a company that develops and sells software that supports omnichannel communications. According to the Complaint, DSI’s software includes numerous technological improvements that were captured in a family of patent applications.

article thumbnail

[Video] Webinar | Best Practices for Noninfringing Redesign

JD Supra Law

Software and hardware product development always comes with a risk of patent infringement litigation, which can result in damages awards, exclusion orders, and, in some cases, injunctions. One of the most effective strategies to avoid such a fate is to redesign the accused products around the asserted patent claims.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

New Paris-Based Company Sued for Alleged Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Johnson claims it owns multiple utility and design patents including those at issue in this case, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,022,332 , 10,684,029 , 10,528,013 , 8,826,165 , 8,190,728 , D788,785 , D924,888 , D924,890 (collectively, “Asserted Patents”).

article thumbnail

Netsoft Holdings, LLC Sued for Alleged Patent Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

9,261,365 (the “‘365 Patent”). The ‘365 Patent is titled “Device, System and Method for Remotely Entering, Storing and Sharing Addresses for a Positional Information Device.” For example, the Product may include Netsoft’s Hubstaff asset tracking platform and any associated hardware, apps, or other software.

article thumbnail

Patent litigators and patent lawyers representing generic pharmaceutical companies should be on the lookout for Patent Office’s PTA calculation mistakes

LexBlog IP

The following article by Dinis Cheian is an interesting analysis of patent extension calculation errors that Cheian claims to have found in the Patent Office’s software. The Patent Office’s software is miscalculating the expiration extensions of some patents. 121 have been litigated as of 2016.

article thumbnail

Patent litigators and patent lawyers representing generic pharmaceutical companies should be on the lookout for Patent Office’s PTA calculation mistakes

Chicago IP

The following article by Dinis Cheian is an interesting analysis of patent extension calculation errors that Cheian claims to have found in the Patent Office’s software. The Patent Office’s software is miscalculating the expiration extensions of some patents. I found this problem in 24,914 patents.

article thumbnail

Copyrightability of Software: The Next Big Case

Patently-O

The next big software copyright case is before the Federal Circuit in the form of SAS Institute, Inc. The litigation has substantial parallels to Google v. WPL is a UK based software company who obtained several copies of SAS statistical software and made a clone version. by Dennis Crouch. Dismissal Memorandum.

Copyright 126