Remove review the-patent-prosecution-review
article thumbnail

Upcoming Changes in Korean Patent Law for 2024

LexBlog IP

Upcoming Changes in Korean Patent Law for 2024 by John DeStefano Understanding the 2024 Korean Patent Law Amendments As champions of innovation and protectors of intellectual property, it is vital for us to stay informed about the most recent developments in patent law worldwide.

article thumbnail

USPTO Fees: Targeted Higher Fees to Push for Compact

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed a new fee structure for fiscal year 2025 , which includes significant increases in various patent fees. Many filers will likely change their practices based on the new higher fees. One of the most striking changes in the proposed fee structure.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

In re Xencor: USPTO’s Inaction Following Federal Circuit Remand

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch On January 23, 2024, the Federal Circuit granted the USPTO’s request for a remand in the case of In re Xencor, Inc. The appeal focused on two important issues concerning written description requirements for means-plus-function (MPF) and Jepson claims in the context of antibody patents. ARP is the new POP).

Patent 45
article thumbnail

What I’m reading from academic journals

Patently-O

The following are a few of the articles that I’ve been delving into this past week: James Hicks, Do Patents Drive Investment in Software? , 1277 (2024). Ana Santos Rutschman, From Myriad to Moderna: The Modern Pharmaceutical Company , Texas A&M University Journal of Property Law (2024) (forthcoming). 1131 (2024).

article thumbnail

Sonos v. Google: Late Claiming Estoppel

Patently-O

Google that rendered two Sonos patents unenforceable due to prosecution laches. Dan Bagatell, Perkins Coie’s head of Federal Circuit Patent Appeals Practice has filed an appearance in the case for Google. Any benefit to Sonos was merely incidental and not the kind of economic prejudice required for prosecution laches.

Patent 49
article thumbnail

ITC: Apple is an “Adjudicated Infringer” Improperly Seeking “Permission to Continue Infringing”

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch This article analyzes some of the latest developments in the ongoing legal battle between medical device company Masimo and tech giant Apple regarding Apple’s adjudged infringement of Masimo’s pulse oximetry patents in its Apple Watch.

Patent 82
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 15- January 21)

SpicyIP

Do read our summaries of the post on the history of IP teaching in India, some pressing questions arising out of a recent patent prosecution proceeding, and Bombay High Court’s interpretation of Section 60, Copyright Act. Here is a brief recap of IP developments from last week. Read this guest post by Suriya Balakanthan to know more.