Remove topics claim-construction
article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. The claims are directed to a method of determining a user’s location with a GPS and displaying images the user based on their location. was correct. Sanderling failed to do so.

Invention 130
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

Intellectual Property Law Blog

The Board granted institution without construing any claim terms, as neither party had raised any claim construction issues. Intel’s reply also provided a proposed construction not limiting “storage element” to being part of an energy transfer system. Background and Procedural History ParkerVision owned U.S.

Inventor 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

JD Supra Law

December 15, 2023) primarily involved three topics: (1) the type of language in a patent specification that “clearly expresses” that the inventor was acting as a lexicographer, i.e., redefining a term against the term’s plain and ordinary meaning, (2) the appropriate scope of a reply brief when a patent owner introduces a claim construction for the (..)

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Emphasizes the Importance of Prosecution History in Resolving Ambiguous Claim Terms in University of Massachusetts v. L’Oréal USA, Inc.

JD Supra Law

On June 13, 2022, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion that vacated the district court’s judgment of indefiniteness, deciding that the ruling was based on an erroneous claim construction. The patents-in-suit claimed methods for skin enhancement by topical application of compositions containing adenosine.

Patent 98
article thumbnail

Patent Law Primer: A Newsletter Series on Key Patent Law Topics

Patently-O

Each essay delves into legal and practical aspects of various patent law topics while weaving in stories of notable court cases and patent disputes, in an attempt to provide readers with more memorable context. Your input will help make this newsletter series a useful and engaging resource. — Dennis

article thumbnail

U Mass v L’Oréal: Avoiding indefiniteness through claim construction

Patently-O

This opinion nominally addressing indefiniteness illustrates the power of de novo claim construction review at the Federal Circuit. UMass’s claimed invention is a topical skin care product containing adenosine that is applied to the skin. ” Slip Op.

article thumbnail

WIPO publishes Guide to Patent Case Management for Judges

The IPKat

Vision for the IP judiciary In addition to the full guide, available in PDF and in HTML, readers are able to create their own custom guide for any combination of jurisdictions and topics covered in the Guide, by clicking on the “Build custom guide” tab in the top banner or at this link. International comity in patent cases.