topics self-disclosure-requirements 
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 3, 2023
RLP submitted almost 1000 pages of trial exhibits completely under seal and did not provide the relevant public and redacted versions required by the Board. In its decision, the Board discussed the importance of properly categorizing and filing evidence, especially confidential and/or self-authenticating evidence.
Patently-O
MAY 31, 2023
This discovery is especially important because it tells us that overcoming any female productivity deficit requires both the removal of barriers to accomplishment as well as proper attribution. We discovered that while women are less likely to self-identify as inventors, both genders equally identify as problem-solvers.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 10, 2022
Both Groups require prospective members to undergo a screening process. The ECPA requires the plaintiff to show that “her posts in the Groups were not readily accessible by the general public.” it might very well want to deploy more visible disclosures informing users what “private” means and doesn’t mean.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
FTC does not want disclosure below the “more” expansion link, if any; it has to be above so anyone will see it even if they don’t seek out more info. Certain procedural requirements: must be able to see & save a copy of the disclosures/contract w/in 15 days, via email receipt for example.
43(B)log
JUNE 29, 2023
Copyright as an example: requiring disclosure of datasets used for training by the initiators of the model doesn’t solve any of the actual problems of how users are using the model by adding new inputs to train it further. Might be broken down by topic. DSA’s self-audit requirements: can this work?
The IPKat
JULY 30, 2021
Ten years ago, a proportionality test was a radical idea embraced only by a handful of academics [see here for one of the earliest EU-focused publications on the topic]. This may be self-evident to Anglo-Saxon courts and judges, but it is not at all obvious in the context of a strict civil law system, such as Germany.
SpicyIP
JULY 3, 2022
Here lies the rub ( empathetically ) – if you ask further about ‘what is/isn’t wrong’ or ‘why we deserve something (especially as against others)’, a bundle of self-sanctified reasonings come in. Thus, as per a lay person, a legal right would be something that is “not wrong” and “deserving”. . Pocrati: Yeah, exactly.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content