Remove topics statutory-requirements
article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Courts are not required to defer to the Patent Office determinations as to eligibility, because review under ¶ 101 is de novo. Sanderling failed to do so.

Invention 130
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Januarys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Then, Arundathi Venkataraman discussed the topic using the case of Garcia v. As Yogesh Byadwal’s most recent post on this topic made me think. Intrigued, I parsed the past posts to understand how the discussion on this topic has evolved over the years. Statutory Law. Given the gust of these ghastly orders, Prof.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Online Safety & Media Regulation Bill 2022 signed into law

LexBlog IP

The Media Commission will be empowered to make binding Online Safety Codes with which designated relevant online service providers will be required to comply and will set out rules regarding how those providers should tackle the availability of harmful and illegal content on their services.

Law 52
article thumbnail

Yearbook Defendants Lose Two More Section 230 Rulings

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court is making a tricky statutory analysis; While the submitters may not have created/developed the yearbook, they did create/develop the “submission” they made to PeopleConnect. This court disagrees with the Callahan judge’s statutory reading. ” Statutory Publicity Rights Claim (3344).

article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Still, the guidelines spend some time on the requirements of a prima facie case; the necessity of both evidence and reasoning to support any obviousness rejection; and consideration of all evidence before the examiner. 2023) as “not[ing] the flexible approach under KSR as applied to the ‘same field of endeavor’ test.'”

Art 121
article thumbnail

Minnesota Wants to Ban Under-18s From User-Generated Content Services

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” In addition to other damages, the PRA authorizes statutory damages of $1k per violation, capped at $100k per account holder per calendar year. It’s also unclear if a service could thread content by topic, or if topical organization also would be an “algorithm.”

article thumbnail

“What’s in a name?”: Trademark Considerations for Rebranding a Business

IPilogue

As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. From a business standpoint , aside from the statutory requirements for registrability, it is important to opt for marks that are simple, recognizable, and flexible to allow for future growth in the market. Conclusion.

Business 111