LexBlog IP

AUGUST 4, 2022

“Embedding” means the process of copying unique HTML code assigned to the location of a digital copy of the photo or video published to the Internet, and the insertion of that code into a target webpage or social media post so that photo or video is linked for display within the target post. District Judge Charles R.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Licensing Publishing Social Media 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 3, 2023

The named plaintiff is a photojournalist whose photographs were featured on the websites of various media outlets without a license. Hunley alleged that the third parties who displayed her photos via use of Instagram’s embedding tool committed direct copyright infringement and that Instagram was secondarily liable for that infringement.

Copying 52

Copying Copyright Social Media Copyright Infringement 52

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 20, 2022

In a time when the internet existed but the main income of artists and performers was still from selling " copies " of their albums, records, episodes and concerts, he probably would not have even been able to contemplate the existence of a " streaming service " that might change the rules just a few years later. Where were you in 2007?

Music 52

Music IP Licensing Copyright 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 1, 2023

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Recently, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed what has become known as the “server test”: in order to be held directly liable for violating the public display right, the alleged infringer must have a fixed “copy” of the work stored on a server in its possession or control. July 17, 2023).

Blogging 95

Blogging Copying Social Media Copyright 95

Copyright Lately

AUGUST 2, 2021

That’s because, according to Instagram, embedding doesn’t constitute an act of direct copyright infringement in the first place. Instagram’s argument relies upon the server test, a rule that has its origins in the 2007 Ninth Circuit case Perfect 10 v. Therefore, there’s no direct infringement. View Fullscreen.

Copying 97

Copying Copyright Technology Licensing 97

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 31, 2023

Is Rick Astley’s right of publicity claim against Yung Gravy for vocal impersonation on a collision course with the federal Copyright Act? British singer Rick Astley is best known for “ Never Gonna Give You Up ,” a song people voluntarily listened to in 1987 and were tricked into listening to in 2007.

Music 99

Music Copyright Licensing Copyright Infringement 99

SpicyIP

MAY 23, 2022

On the 20th of May, the Supreme Court, in M/s Knit Pro International vs The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr , held that offences under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 are cognizable and non-bailable offences. Abdul Sathar v Nodal Officer, Anti-Piracy Cell, Kerala Crime Branch Office & Anr, 2007. Andhra Pradesh. State Govt.

Copyright 137

Copyright Ownership Copyright Infringement Law 137

TorrentFreak

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

When TVkaista launched in Finland way back in 2007, storing video in the cloud certainly wasn’t taken for granted as it is now. In letters sent to around 20 companies, TTVK warned that without proper licensing, these services were illegal and must be shut down.

Copyright Infringement 91

Copyright Infringement Copyright Fair Use Licensing 91

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 15, 2024

If the Supreme Court upholds the discovery rule for copyright cases, or simply declines to address it, the decision will leave copyright defendants exposed to very large awards for years of infringing conduct (as they have been everywhere but the Second Circuit). to license works from the Music Specialist catalog.

Music 77

Music Blogging Copyright Ownership 77

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

As the story goes, they provided him with a copy of a few scenes from “Ghostbusters” in which the theme would appear. But Lewis thought the song was a rip-off of “I Want a New Drug” and asserted a copyright infringement claim against Columbia Pictures. to write the’s film’s signature song.

Copyright 144

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 144

LexBlog IP

JULY 5, 2022

The term of a copyright for a particular work may depends on certain factors such as whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. [2] 2] The general rule for works created after January 1, 1978, provides that copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years. [3]

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Design Patent Designs Design 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2022

994 (2020) , a decision holding that the sovereign immunity of individual states prevented a copyright holder from recovering damages for infringement, I was a bit disheartened. ” When a governmental entity infringes, it is using the inventor’s, or the author’s, creation without license or payment.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Invention Copyright 52

Above the Fold

JULY 5, 2022

The term of a copyright for a particular work may depends on certain factors such as whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. [2] 2] The general rule for works created after January 1, 1978, provides that copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years. [3]

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property Design Patent Designs Design 40

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

The Delhi High Court, while taking note of the documents and evidence on record, concluded that the Plaintiff had, in fact, not consented and given license to the defendants to make the film in any manner that they wished. 2007, I, no. InRaja Pocket Books v. In another case of Indian Performing Rights Society v. 125, pourvoi no.

Privacy 96

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 96